ArticleBlood advances2017
Intragenic amplification of
Article in Blood advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novelBlood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Fast and sensitive detection of targeted gene fusions using frequency minimizers and fuzzy pattern matching with Fuzzion2.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Copy number alterations in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients and their association with patients' outcome.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Review
- PAX5::AUTS2 childhood B-ALL: a relapse-prone genetic subtype with frequent central nervous system involvement and a poor outcome.Leukemia · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Genetic Heterogeneity of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Based on NGS Applications.Cancers · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Transcription factor networks link B-lymphocyte development and malignant transformation in leukemia.Genes & development · 2023Review
- Allelic complexity of KMT2A partial tandem duplications in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.Blood advances · 2022Article
- Characterization of PAX5 intragenic tandem multiplication in pediatric B-lymphoblastic leukemia by optical genome mapping.Blood advances · 2022Article
- Review
- Clinical impacts of copy number variations in B-cell differentiation and cell cycle control genes in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a single centre experience.Radiology and oncology · 2021Article
- Advances in germline predisposition to acute leukaemias and myeloid neoplasms.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2021Review
- A New Treatment Strategy for Early T-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Case Report and Literature Review.OncoTargets and therapy · 2021Article
- B-ALL Complexity: Is Targeted Therapy Still A Valuable Approach for Pediatric Patients?Cancers · 2020Review
- Frequency and prognostic impact of PAX5 p.P80R in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated on an AIEOP-BFM acute lymphoblastic leukemia protocol.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2020Article
- MLPA and DNA index improve the molecular diagnosis of childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intragenic
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.