Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29296480›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2017

Wavelet-based statistical classification of skin images acquired with reflectance confocal microscopy.

Abdelghafour Halimi, Hadj Batatia, Jimmy Le Digabel, Gwendal Josse, Jean Yves Tourneret

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdelghafour HalimiUniversity of Toulouse, IRIT-INPT, 2 rue Camichel, BP 7122, 31071 Toulouse cedex 7, France.
Hadj BatatiaUniversity of Toulouse, IRIT-INPT, 2 rue Camichel, BP 7122, 31071 Toulouse cedex 7, France.
Jimmy Le DigabelCentre de Recherche sur la Peau, Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique, 2 rue Viguerie, 31025 Toulouse Cedex 3, France.
Gwendal JosseCentre de Recherche sur la Peau, Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique, 2 rue Viguerie, 31025 Toulouse Cedex 3, France.
Jean Yves TourneretUniversity of Toulouse, IRIT-INPT, 2 rue Camichel, BP 7122, 31071 Toulouse cedex 7, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting skin lentigo in reflectance confocal microscopy images is an important and challenging problem. This imaging modality has not yet been widely investigated for this problem and there are a few automatic processing techniques. They are mostly based on machine learning approaches and rely on numerous classical image features that lead to high computational costs given the very large resolution of these images. This paper presents a detection method with very low computational complexity that is able to identify the skin depth at which the lentigo can be detected. The proposed method performs multiresolution decomposition of the image obtained at each skin depth. The distribution of image pixels at a given depth can be approximated accurately by a generalized Gaussian distribution whose parameters depend on the decomposition scale, resulting in a very-low-dimension parameter space. SVM classifiers are then investigated to classify the scale parameter of this distribution allowing real-time detection of lentigo. The method is applied to 45 healthy and lentigo patients from a clinical study, where sensitivity of 81.4% and specificity of 83.3% are achieved. Our results show that lentigo is identifiable at depths between 50

Indexed as

(100.0100) Image processing(100.2960) Image analysis(100.7410) Wavelets(170.0170) Medical optics and biotechnology(170.0180) Microscopy(170.6935) Tissue characterization

Identifiers

PMID29296480
PMCPMC5745095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.