Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29296460›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT2017

Internal validation of the prognostic index for spine metastasis (PRISM) for stratifying survival in patients treated with spinal stereotactic radiosurgery.

Garrett Jensen, Chad Tang, Kenneth R Hess, Andrew J Bishop, Hubert Y Pan, Jing Li, James N Yang, Nizar M Tannir, Behrang Amini, Claudio Tatsui and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Local control of 1-5 fraction radiotherapy regimens for spinal metastases: an analysis of the impacts of biologically effective dose and primary histology.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Garrett JensenBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Chad TangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kenneth R HessDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Andrew J BishopDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hubert Y PanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
James N YangDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Nizar M TannirDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Behrang AminiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Claudio TatsuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Laurence RhinesDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Amol J GhiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Anderson University - South Carolina · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe sought to validate the Prognostic Index for Spinal Metastases (PRISM), a scoring system that stratifies patients into subgroups by overall survival.Methods and materials: The PRISM was previously created from multivariate Cox regression with patients enrolled in prospective single institution trials of stereotactic spine radiosurgery (SSRS) for spinal metastasis. We assess model calibration and discrimination within a validation cohort of patients treated off-trial with SSRS for metastatic disease at the same institution.

resultsThe training and validation cohorts consisted of 205 and 249 patients respectively. Similar survival trends were shown in the 4 PRISM. Survival was significantly different between PRISM subgroups (P<0.0001). C-index for the validation cohort was 0.68 after stratification into subgroups.

conclusionsWe internally validated the PRISM with patients treated off-protocol, demonstrating that it can distinguish subgroups by survival, which will be useful for individualizing treatment of spinal metastases and stratifying patients for clinical trials.

Indexed as

metastatic diseaseprognostic scoreSBRTSSRS

Identifiers

PMID29296460
PMCPMC5675505
OpenAlexW3014013884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.