ArticleJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT2016
Limitations of using population-based databases to assess trends in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery.
Article in Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparable performance of machine learning algorithms in predicting readmission and complications following total joint arthroplasty with external validation.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2023Article
- Nonindex Readmission After Ruptured Brain Aneurysm Treatment Is Associated with Higher Morbidity and Repeat Readmission.World neurosurgery · 2019Article
- Readmission following inpatient stereotactic radiosurgery for brain tumors.Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There exist no population-based examinations of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of the spine. To address this, spinal SRS was analyzed using the New Jersey State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (SASD) and Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) over 10-year periods. The SASD is a state-specific ambulatory surgery and outpatient database, while the NIS database comprises approximately 20% of all nonfederal hospital inpatient admissions and discharges in the United States. Only patients receiving SRS for at least one spinal lesion were included (ICD-9-CM=92.3x; diagnosis codes=63620,63621). 4,194,207 patients were contained in the New Jersey SASD from 2003-2012, of whom fewer than 0.0003% received SRS of any sort, with none receiving SRS of the spine. Of the 78,686,628 patients contained in the NIS, only 16 (0.00002%) received radiosurgery, none of whom received SRS of the spine. In conclusion, a decade-long analysis of the NIS and SASD from the most densely populated state in the United States revealed that no patients received spinal SRS with virtually none receiving SRS of any sort. Given the improbability of these findings, it is much more likely that neither the NIS nor SASD can accurately capture patients receiving SRS. Accurate characterization of the incidence and usage of spinal SRS will require databases less reliant on ICD-9 coding than the SASD or NIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29296442PMC5658800W2528539613What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.