ArticleJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT2016
The role of stereotactic radiosurgery and whole brain radiation therapy as primary treatment in the treatment of patients with brain oligometastases - A systematic review.
Article in Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Should we be afraid of radiotherapy for hemorrhagic brain metastases? A narrative review.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Review
- Tumor control and survival in patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: a retrospective analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- Adaptive Hybrid Surgery: Paradigm Shift for Patient-centered Neurosurgery.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of patients presenting with a limited number of brain metastases (BM) (oligo-metastases, defined as less than 3 BM) has evolved from Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) alone to more aggressive strategies adding surgical resection and Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) to the armamentarium. In choosing treatment modalities, the relative importance of the patient's age and clinical parameters, the number or volume of BM and the potential treatment related adverse-effects has been a matter of much debate. For patients with oligometastatic BM, local therapy using SRS in addition to WBRT was shown to improve time to neurologic deterioration, relapse rate and Overall Survival (OS). In patients who receive local therapy (SRS or surgery), adjuvant WBRT was shown to improve regional (brain) relapse rate. In the contemporary era, the beneficial effect of WBRT on lengthening the time of neurologic independence or OS when compared to no further treatment is unclear. One Meta-analysis pooling of information from several reports concluded that for younger patients (<50 years), SRS alone favored survival and that the initial omission of WBRT did not impact distant brain relapse rates. Other recent reports demonstrated on the contrary an OS benefit, more pronounced in good prognosis patients (diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment 2.4-4.0) treated with SRS+WBRT compared to those who received SRS alone. As of today, there remains a role for both SRS and WBRT in the management of patients with oligo-metastatic BM but consensus about when to employ one or both is lacking. The exact patient selection criteria to benefit from either or both are still a matter of active research and heated debate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29296432PMC5658879W2980947125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.