ArticleJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT2016
Quantifying the trigger level of the vacuum surveillance system of the Gamma-Knife eXtend™ positioning system and evaluating the potential impact on dose delivery.
Article in Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intra-fraction motion gating during frameless Gamma KnifeJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2019Article
- Quantifying the effects of positional uncertainties and estimating margins for Gamma-KnifeJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis work evaluates the precision and characteristics of the trigger level of the vacuum surveillance system of eXtend™ on Gamma Knife Perfexion and the effect of the potential displacement on the dose distribution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 20 individually moulded mouthpieces based on human dental models were used to measure translational shift and rotation until the vacuum surveillance of eXtend interrupted the irradiation. The positional accuracy of the movement was 0.01 mm using a computerized numerically controlled positioning system. Rotation was introduced by peripheral pressure in superior or inferior direction on the mould and was measured with a digital inclinometer. In 10 patients with a large brain metastasis the effect of a potential displacement of the centre of the target was recalculated. Two out of the 10 targets were located near the optic nerve and chiasm. In addition, the potential displacement of the chiasm and the optic nerve due to rotation based on their distance to the centre of rotation (COR, the mouthpiece) was evaluated. For the recalculation of the delivered dose after a displacement, GammaPlan Software® was used. Dose distribution with displacement between ±0.1 mm and ±2.0 mm was simulated for ten targets with volumes between 7.7 cm
resultsThe vacuum between mouthpiece and dental model was broken by a mean translation of the mouthpiece of 0.15 mm (SD ±0.05 mm, range 0.05-0.29 mm) or a mean rotation of 0.33º (SD ±0.15º, range 0.05-1.0º). Rotation caused by pressure in the inferior direction was higher with 0.42º (SD ±0.16º) compared to rotation due to pressure in the superior direction with 0.21º (SD ±0.09º). The mean rotation would produce a mean displacement of 0.64 mm for the target, 0.39 mm for the chiasm and 0.33 mm for the optic nerve, for the group of patients studied. The biggest effect of positional deviation was seen in the minimum dose to the target, with 2.5% reduction for a 0.5 mm and 5% for a 1.0 mm shift in the Z-direction respectively.
conclusionsThe trigger level is sensitive and reproducible. A sudden movement by the patient, such as an attempt to get out or correct an uncomfortable position would interrupt irradiation immediately. The dominant effect for a displacement is due to rotation. The resulting displacement depends on the distance between target and COR (magnitude) and the location (direction). Therefore, lesions near chiasm or brainstem, which are closer to the COR, are less affected from a rotation than peripheral targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29296424PMC5658833What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.