Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29296279›Full record

ReviewJournal of nutritional science2017

Nutrients and perinatal depression: a systematic review.

Thalia M Sparling, Robin C Nesbitt, Nicholas Henschke, Sabine Gabrysch

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nutritional science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. African American Food Environments and Anti-Inflammatory Intake in Pregnancy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Folate intake,The British journal of nutrition · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Postpartum depression: aetiology, pathogenesis and the role of nutrients and dietary supplements in prevention and management.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thalia M SparlingInstitute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Robin C NesbittInstitute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Nicholas HenschkeInstitute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sabine GabryschInstitute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy and lactation deplete nutrients essential to the neurotransmission system. This may be one reason for the increased risk of depression during the perinatal period. The objective of the present review was to systematically review the literature and summarise evidence on whether blood nutrient levels influence the risk of perinatal depression. PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched for studies of any design. A total of twenty-four articles of different designs were included, representing 14 262 subjects. We extracted data on study population, depression prevalence, nutrients examined, deficiency prevalence, timing of assessment, reporting, analysis strategy and adjustment factors. In all, fourteen studies found associations of perinatal depression with lower levels of folate, vitamin D, Fe, Se, Zn, and fats and fatty acids, while two studies found associations between perinatal depression and higher nutrient levels, and eight studies found no evidence of an association. Only ten studies had low risk of bias. Given the methodological limitations and heterogeneity of study approaches and results, the evidence for a causal link between nutritional biomarkers and perinatal depression is still inconclusive. High-quality studies in deficient populations are needed.

Indexed as

CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression ScaleEPDS, Edinburgh Postpartum Depression ScaleLMIC, low-income and middle-income countriesMaternal healthNutrientsNutritional biomarkersPerinatal depressionRCT, randomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID29296279
PMCPMC5738654
OpenAlexW2780109558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.