Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29296107›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2017

Observational long-term follow-up study of rapid food oral immunotherapy with omalizumab.

Sandra Andorf, Monali Manohar, Tina Dominguez, Whitney Block, Dana Tupa, Rohun A Kshirsagar, Vanitha Sampath, R Sharon Chinthrajah, Kari C Nadeau

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03234764 (Longitudinal Follow-up Study for Food Allergies), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03234764 completednot on this map

Longitudinal Follow-up Study for Food Allergies

TypeobservationalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2016 to 2017Enrolled166ConditionsFood AllergyArmsImmunotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HLA-DRAllergy · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Recent advances in food allergen immunotherapy.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Oral Immunotherapy in Food Allergy: Where Are We Now?Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2023
    Review
  9. Management of IgE-mediated food allergy in the 21st century.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Review
  10. The rationale for development of ligelizumab in food allergy.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Pathogenesis of IgE-mediated food allergy and implications for future immunotherapeutics.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Oral immunotherapy for multiple foods in a pediatric allergy clinic setting.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra Andorf *Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, 269 Campus Drive CCSR 3215, MC 5366, Stanford, CA 94305-5101 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2146-2955
Monali Manohar *Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, 269 Campus Drive CCSR 3215, MC 5366, Stanford, CA 94305-5101 USA.
Tina DominguezSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, 269 Campus Drive CCSR 3215, MC 5366, Stanford, CA 94305-5101 USA.
Whitney BlockSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, 269 Campus Drive CCSR 3215, MC 5366, Stanford, CA 94305-5101 USA.
Dana TupaSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, 269 Campus Drive CCSR 3215, MC 5366, Stanford, CA 94305-5101 USA.
Rohun A KshirsagarSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, 269 Campus Drive CCSR 3215, MC 5366, Stanford, CA 94305-5101 USA.
Vanitha SampathSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, 269 Campus Drive CCSR 3215, MC 5366, Stanford, CA 94305-5101 USA.
R Sharon Chinthrajah *Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, 269 Campus Drive CCSR 3215, MC 5366, Stanford, CA 94305-5101 USA.
Kari C Nadeau *Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, 269 Campus Drive CCSR 3215, MC 5366, Stanford, CA 94305-5101 USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Tracking allergen specific T cells in multi-food allergyU19AI104209 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GALLI, STEPHEN JOSEPH · 2013 to 2025
$17.3M
Development of Improved Diagnostic Allergy TestR21AI095838 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NADEAU, KARI C. · 2011 to 2012
$435k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI095838NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI104209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of clinical studies focused on treating a single food allergy through oral immunotherapy (OIT) with adjunctive omalizumab treatment have been published. We previously demonstrated safety and tolerability of a rapid OIT protocol using omalizumab in a phase 1 study to achieve desensitization to multiple (up to 5) food allergens in parallel, rapidly (7-36 weeks; median = 18 weeks). In the current long-term, observational study, we followed 34 food allergic participants for over 5 years, who had originally undergone the phase 1 rapid OIT protocol.

methodsAfter reaching the maintenance dose of 2 g protein for each of their respective food allergens as a part of the phase 1 study, the long-term maintenance dose was reduced for some participants based on a pragmatic team-based decision. Participants were followed up to 62 months through standard oral food challenges (OFCs), skin prick tests, and blood tests.

resultsEach participant passed the 2 g OFC to each of their offending food allergens (up to 5 food allergens in total) at the end of the long-term follow-up (LTFU) study.

conclusionOur data demonstrate the feasibility of long-term maintenance dosing of a food allergen without compromising the desensitized status conferred through rapid-OIT.

Indexed as

Follow-upFood allergyMaintenance dosingOmalizumabOral immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29296107
PMCPMC5738812
OpenAlexW2776697551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.