Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29296105›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2017

Establishment and evaluation of four different types of patient-derived xenograft models.

Xiaoqian Ji, Siyu Chen, Yanwu Guo, Wende Li, Xiaolong Qi, Han Yang, Sa Xiao, Guang Fang, Jinfang Hu, Chuangyu Wen and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The impact of initial tumor microenvironment on imaging phenotype.Cancer treatment and research communications · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Xiaoqian Ji *School of Basic Courses, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510006 China.
Siyu Chen *Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Key Laboratory Animal Lab, 11 Fengxin Road, Science City, Guangzhou, 510663 China.
Yanwu GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282 China.
Wende LiGuangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Key Laboratory Animal Lab, 11 Fengxin Road, Science City, Guangzhou, 510663 China.
Xiaolong QiDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Baiyun Road North, Guangzhou, 510080 China.
Han YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510030 China.
Sa XiaoGuangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Key Laboratory Animal Lab, 11 Fengxin Road, Science City, Guangzhou, 510663 China.
Guang FangGuangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Key Laboratory Animal Lab, 11 Fengxin Road, Science City, Guangzhou, 510663 China.
Jinfang HuGuangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Key Laboratory Animal Lab, 11 Fengxin Road, Science City, Guangzhou, 510663 China.
Chuangyu WenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology and the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510150 China.
Huanliang LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology and the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510150 China.
Zhen HanDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Baiyun Road North, Guangzhou, 510080 China.
Guangxu DengDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Baiyun Road North, Guangzhou, 510080 China.
Qingbin YangDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Baiyun Road North, Guangzhou, 510080 China.
Xiangling YangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology and the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510150 China.
Yuting XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282 China.
Zhihong PengGuangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Key Laboratory Animal Lab, 11 Fengxin Road, Science City, Guangzhou, 510663 China.
Fengping LiDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Baiyun Road North, Guangzhou, 510080 China.
Nvlue CaiGuangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Key Laboratory Animal Lab, 11 Fengxin Road, Science City, Guangzhou, 510663 China.
Guoxin LiDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Baiyun Road North, Guangzhou, 510080 China.
Ren HuangGuangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Key Laboratory Animal Lab, 11 Fengxin Road, Science City, Guangzhou, 510663 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-derived xenografts (PDX) have a biologically stable in tumor architecture, drug responsiveness, mutational status and global gene-expression patterns. Numerous PDX models have been established to date, however their thorough characterization regarding the tumor formation and rates of tumor growth in the established models remains a challenging task. Our study aimed to provide more detailed information for establishing the PDX models successfully and effectively.

methodsWe transplanted four different types of solid tumors from 108 Chinese patients, including 21 glioblastoma (GBM), 11 lung cancers (LC), 54 gastric cancers (GC) and 21 colorectal cancers (CRC), and took tumor tissues passaged for three successive generations. Here we report the rate of tumor formation, tumor-forming times, tumor growth curves and mortality of mice in PDX model. We also report H&E staining and immunohistochemistry for HLA-A, CD45, Ki67, GFAP, and CEA protein expression between patient cancer tissues and PDX models.

resultsTumor formation rate increased significantly in subsequent tumor generations. Also, the survival rates of GC and CRC were remarkably higher than GBM and LC. As for the time required for the formation of tumors, which reflects the tumor growth rate, indicated that tumor growth rate always increased as the generation number increased. The tumor growth curves also illustrate this law. Similarly, the survival rate of PDX mice gradually improved with the increased generation number in GC and CRC. And generally, there was more proliferation (Ki67+) in the PDX models than in the patient tumors, which was in accordance with the results of tumor growth rate. The histological findings confirm similar histological architecture and degrees of differentiation between patient cancer tissues and PDX models with statistical analysis by GraphPad Prism 5.0.

conclusionWe established four different types of PDX models successfully, and our results add to the current understanding of the establishment of PDX models and may contribute to the extension of application of different types of PDX models.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancer (CRC)Gastric cancer (GC)Glioblastoma (GBM)Lung cancer (LC)Patient derived xenograft (PDX)

Identifiers

PMID29296105
PMCPMC5738885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.