ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2018
Determinants of successful medical education of caregivers of children with congenital heart diseases.
Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Body modification: piercing and tattooing in congenital heart disease patients", decoration or disaster?-a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021Review
- Gaining Experience Over Time: The Family Caregivers' Perception of Patients with a Tracheostomy in Home Care.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
- Design of a mobile application for home monitoring of babies with complex congenital heart disease.Revista CuidarteArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the implementation and efficiency of medical education among the caregivers of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and to investigate its success factors. MATERIAL AND
methodA cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2014 to March 2014 in a tertiary healthcare center. Study included 120 caregivers of children with CHD visiting the Paediatric Cardiology Clinic that included 93% mothers, aged 31.72 ± 6.67 years, 38.3% Saudi citizens and 45.0% had a high educational level. Caregivers were interviewed through a semi-structured questionnaire that included socio-demographic data of participants and demographic and clinical data of patients; awareness about the diagnosis and self-assessed understanding of thedisease; disease dimensions explained, educational material used andefficacy of whole medical education received in alleviating caregivers' anxiety.
resultsOf children who had CHD, around 42.5% were males aged 5.65 ± 3.99 years and 37.3% had ventral septal defect, 14.4% had atrial septal defectand 19.5% had a complex CHD. Study results showed that 83.3% of caregivers were aware of the correct diagnosis and 64.2% had good understanding of the nature and effect of the disease. Frequently explained disease dimensions were impact on child's growth (65.8%), complications (57.5%), and outcomes (55.0%). Least frequently explained dimensions were those related to infective endocarditis (IEC) including risk factors (15.8%), prophylaxis (17.5%), complications (19.2%) and symptoms (22.5%). The whole medical education received was efficient to enable good understanding of the disease and alleviate anxiety in 70.8% and 62.5% of the cases, respectively. Time dedicated to educate, use of illustrating educational materials, explaining various disease dimensions (aetiology, complications, prognosis, long-term management, etc.) and the number of dimensions explained were all significant predictors for both good understanding of the child's disease and anxiety relief among caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.