Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29296002›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2018

Exposure to tobacco smoke and validation of smoking status during pregnancy in the MIREC study.

Tye E Arbuckle, Chun Lei Liang, Mandy Fisher, Nicolas J Caron, William D Fraser, and the MIREC Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Maternal Folate Status and the Relation between Gestational Arsenic Exposure and Child Health Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Predictors of Secondhand Smoke Exposure During Pregnancy in Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, and Honduras.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tye E ArbucklePopulation Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Tye.arbuckle@canada.ca.
Chun Lei LiangPopulation Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mandy FisherPopulation Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Nicolas J CaronLe Centre de toxicologie du Québec, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada.
William D FraserCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
and the MIREC Study Group
Health Canada · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP - 81285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given that prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke can lead to increased risks of adverse health effects, having valid measures of exposure is important. In a Canadian cohort (n = 2000), maternal and infant biospecimens were analysed for cotinine. Sensitivity and specificity of self-reported active smoking status were estimated. Regression modelling was used to identify potential predictors of maternal and infant plasma cotinine in non-smoking women. During the first trimester, 60.6% of the women reported never smoking, 27.3% were former smokers, 6.1% had quit when they found out they were pregnant, 5.8% were smokers and 42% of the non-smokers reported exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS). Low detection of tobacco biomarkers in meconium limited its ability to identify exposure to SHS. The sensitivity and specificity for self-reported smoking during the 1st trimester were 85.37 and 99.45%, respectively. The lowest sensitivity was found in participants with the highest level of education and income, oldest women and those born outside Canada. Non-smoking women living in an apartment had 1.7 times higher odds of detectable plasma cotinine than those living in a single home after adjusting for other variables. Our results suggest that while self-reports are fairly accurate, they may be less so in populations with higher socio-economic status. This investigation underscores the need to consider the participant socio-economic characteristics and dwelling type when using questionnaires to estimate active and passive tobacco exposure.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersCanadaCotinineFemaleHumansMaternal ExposureMeconiumPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstPregnant PeopleProspective StudiesRegression AnalysisSmokingSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesBiomarkersCotinineTobacco Smoke PollutionBiomonitoringCotinineMeconiumMultiunit dwellingPlasmaPregnancySmoking

Identifiers

PMID29296002
PMCPMC8075994
OpenAlexW2782007439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.