Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29295810›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Physical Activity Assessment Using an Activity Tracker in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Prospective Observational Study.

Charlotte Jacquemin, Hervé Servy, Anna Molto, Jérémie Sellam, Violaine Foltz, Frédérique Gandjbakhch, Christophe Hudry, Stéphane Mitrovic, Bruno Fautrel, Laure Gossec

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte JacqueminRheumatology Department, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-9605
Hervé ServySanoïa, E-Health Services, Gardanne, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8476-4619
Anna MoltoRheumatology B Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2246-1986
Jérémie SellamRheumatology Department, St-Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1814-6003
Violaine FoltzRheumatology Department, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2097-9239
Frédérique GandjbakhchRheumatology Department, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3181-4598
Christophe HudryRheumatology B Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1036-3660
Stéphane MitrovicRheumatology Department, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5244-7881
Bruno FautrelRheumatology Department, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8845-4274
Laure GossecRheumatology Department, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4528-310X
Sorbonne Université · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Cochin · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical activity can be tracked using mobile devices and is recommended in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) management. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends at least 150 min per week of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to assess and compare physical activity and its patterns in patients with RA and axSpA using an activity tracker and to assess the feasibility of mobile devices in this population.

methodsThis multicentric prospective observational study (ActConnect) included patients who had definite RA or axSpA, and a smartphone. Physical activity was assessed over 3 months using a mobile activity tracker, recording the number of steps per minute. The number of patients reaching the WHO recommendations was calculated. RA and axSpA were compared, using linear mixed models, for number of steps, proportion of morning steps, duration of total activity, and MVPA. Physical activity trajectories were identified using the K-means method, and factors related to the low activity trajectory were explored by logistic regression. Acceptability was assessed by the mean number of days the tracker was worn over the 3 months (ie, adherence), the percentage of wearing time, and by an acceptability questionnaire.

resultsA total of 157 patients (83 RA and 74 axSpA) were analyzed; 36.3% (57/157) patients were males, and their mean age was 46 (standard deviation [SD] 12) years and mean disease duration was 11 (SD 9) years. RA and axSpA patients had similar physical activity levels of 16 (SD 11) and 15 (SD 12) min per day of MVPA (P=.80), respectively. Only 27.4% (43/157) patients reached the recommendations with a mean MVPA of 106 (SD 77) min per week. The following three trajectories were identified with constant activity: low (54.1% [85/157] of patients), moderate (42.7% [67/157] of patients), and high (3.2% [5/157] of patients) levels of MVPA. A higher body mass index was significantly related to less physical activity (odds ratio 1.12, 95% CI 1.11-1.14). The activity trackers were worn during a mean of 79 (SD 17) days over the 90 days follow-up. Overall, patients considered the use of the tracker very acceptable, with a mean score of 8 out 10.

conclusionsPatients with RA and axSpA performed insufficient physical activity with similar levels in both groups, despite the differences between the 2 diseases. Activity trackers allow longitudinal assessment of physical activity in these patients. The good adherence to this study and the good acceptability of wearing activity trackers confirmed the feasibility of the use of a mobile activity tracker in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Indexed as

axial spondylarthritisexercisefitness trackerrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID29295810
PMCPMC5770578
OpenAlexW2782466666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.