Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29295549›Full record

ArticleViruses2017

Comparative Analysis of 37

Dann Turner, Hans-Wolfgang Ackermann, Andrew M Kropinski, Rob Lavigne, J Mark Sutton, Darren M Reynolds

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic landscape of 340 virulent Acinetobacter bacteriophages reveals anti-CRISPR-enriched candidates for therapeutic prioritization.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Genomic landscape of completeFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Lytic Capsule-SpecificViruses · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Screening of PotentialFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Genome Analysis ofBiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dann TurnerDepartment of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK. Dann2.Turner@uwe.ac.uk.
Hans-Wolfgang AckermannFaculty of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectiology, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1X 46, Canada.
Andrew M KropinskiDepartments of Food Science, Molecular and Cellular Biology; and Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. Phage.Canada@gmail.com.
Rob LavigneLaboratory of Gene Technology, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 21, box 2462, 3001 Leuven, Belgium. Rob.Lavigne@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-7377-1314
J Mark SuttonNational Infections Service, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JG, UK. Mark.Sutton@phe.gov.uk.
Darren M ReynoldsDepartment of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK. Darren.Reynold@uwe.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the genus

Indexed as

PhylogenyAcinetobacterBacteriophagesCaudoviralesDNA, ViralGenetic VariationGenome, ViralGenomicsLeviviridaeOpen Reading FramesProteomicsViral ProteinsDNA, ViralViral ProteinsAcinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter phagesbacteriophagesbioinformaticsComparative genomicsphylogenyprotein clustering

Identifiers

PMID29295549
PMCPMC5795418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.