ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2017
Analysis of Clinical Variations in Asthma Care Documented in Electronic Health Records Between Staff and Resident Physicians.
Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Family-Centered Patient Portals for Childhood Asthma Management Among Black Primary Caregivers: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- Application of a natural language processing algorithm to early asthma ascertainment for adults in the era of electronic health records.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Leveraging Electronic Health Records for Guideline-Based Asthma Documentation.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2023Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence Assesses Clinicians' Adherence to Asthma Guidelines Using Electronic Health Records.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022Article
- Feasibility of computerized clinical decision support for pediatric to adult care transitions for patients with special healthcare needs.JAMIA open · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence approaches using natural language processing to advance EHR-based clinical research.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2020Review
- Article
- Regional Variations in Documentation of Sexual Trauma Concepts in Electronic Medical Records in the United States Veterans Health Administration.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2019Article
- Variability in Diagnosed Asthma in Young Children in a Large Pediatric Primary Care Network.Academic pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical documentation using free text to describe a patient's medical status is an essential component of electronic health records (EHRs), and the quality of information in documents plays a critical role in clinical practice and translational research. Physicians are the primary creators of EHRs, but their clinical practices vary substantially, resulting in variations in clinical documentation. These variations can represent a source for potential bias in clinical outcomes and downstream applications using EHRs. Asthma is one example, presenting an inconsistent ascertainment process and criteria. A recent study revealed that resident physicians' knowledge of asthma diagnosis and management is relatively limited. In this study, we examined clinical documentation variations in asthma care between staff and resident physicians using individual words, topics, and asthma-related concepts in EHR clinical narratives. Additionally, we discuss potential biases in building an informatics model and further compare asthma diagnosis and outcomes between two physician groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29295287PMC5859932What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.