Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29295227›Full record

ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2017

A Consensus-Based Approach for Harmonizing the OHDSI Common Data Model with HL7 FHIR.

Guoqian Jiang, Richard C Kiefer, Deepak K Sharma, Eric Prud'hommeaux, Harold R Solbrig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Data Warehousing: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. HL7 FHIR-based tools and initiatives to support clinical research: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guoqian JiangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Richard C KieferDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Deepak K SharmaDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Eric Prud'hommeauxW3C/MIT, Boston, MA, USA.
Harold R SolbrigDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

National Infrastructure for Standardized and Portable EHR Phenotyping AlgorithmsR01GM105688 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LUO, YUAN, PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2013 to 2020
$5.7M
Tools for standardizing clinical research metadata using HL7 FHIRU01HG009450 · NHGRI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, GUOQIAN · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
caCDE-QA: A Quality Assurance Platform for Cancer Study Common Data ElementsU01CA180940 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, GUOQIAN · 2014 to 2016
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA180940NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009450NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of data models have been developed to provide a standardized data interface that supports organizing clinical research data into a standard structure for building the integrated data repositories. HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) is emerging as a next generation standards framework for facilitating health care and electronic health records-based data exchange. The objective of the study was to design and assess a consensus-based approach for harmonizing the OHDSI CDM with HL7 FHIR. We leverage a FHIR W5 (Who, What, When, Where, and Why) Classification System for designing the harmonization approaches and assess their utility in achieving the consensus among curators using a standard inter-rater agreement measure. Moderate agreement was achieved for the model-level harmonization (kappa = 0.50) whereas only fair agreement was achieved for the property-level harmonization (kappa = 0.21). FHIR W5 is a useful tool in designing the harmonization approaches between data models and FHIR, and facilitating the consensus achievement.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsInformation DisseminationConsensusGuidelines as TopicHumanscontrolledObservational studyReference standardsVocabulary

Identifiers

PMID29295227
PMCPMC5939955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.