ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018
To drive or not to drive, that is still the question: current challenges in driving recommendations for patients with brain tumours.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the impact of brain tumours on risk of motor vehicle crashes.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Pooled it
- A Delphi study of current practices and establishing consensus regarding assessment of fitness to drive among patients with brain tumours.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Brain tumors and fitness to drive: A review and multi-disciplinary approach.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Review
- Aging Brains Degrade Driving Safety Performances of the Healthy Elderly.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Driving is a complex task that requires integration of various skills that may be impaired in patients with brain tumours. Determining fitness to drive is a responsibility of all physicians in Canada; however, it is an inconsistent practice based on few objective guidelines. The primary purpose of the study is to determine the consistency of driving recommendations amongst health care professionals in Ontario. Secondary aims include evaluation of physician awareness of driving regulations and determination of whether physicians would benefit from more specific driving guidelines. An 18-item questionnaire was sent to 126 health care professionals who take care of patients with brain tumours in Ontario. Seventy-five health care professionals responded to the survey. Less than 10% said they could reliably determine fitness to drive and almost an equal percentage of respondents indicated that determining fitness to drive should be a shared responsibility. The factors deemed important in determining driving safety were highly variable; 70% indicated that cognitive and emotional deficits were important. Over a third of respondents never heard of the CMA guidelines and of those who were familiar with it, 12.5% felt they were sufficient to inform clinical decisions. 90% of respondents wanted more specific and detailed driving guidelines for patients with brain tumours. The current guidelines for physicians are not specific enough for physicians to confidently determine fitness to drive in this population. These findings suggest the need for more detailed guidelines for driving safety that are based on empirical studies on driving habits and performance in patients with a variety of brain tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29294231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.