Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29294162›Full record

Observational studyDer Anaesthesist2018

[Antibiotic stewardship in a basic care hospital : A retrospective observational study].

M Bonsignore, E Balamitsa, C Nobis, S Tafelski, C Geffers, I Nachtigall

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Der Anaesthesist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M BonsignoreZentrum für Hygiene, Evangelische Kliniken Gelsenkirchen, Munkelstr. 27, 45879, Gelsenkirchen, Deutschland. bonsignore@evk-ge.de.
E BalamitsaKlinik für Innere Medizin, Evangelische Kliniken Gelsenkirchen, Gelsenkirchen, Deutschland.
C NobisKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin und perioperative Schmerztherapie, Evangelische Kliniken Gelsenkirchen, Gelsenkirchen, Deutschland.
S TafelskiKlinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Deutschland.
C GeffersInstitut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Deutschland.
I NachtigallRegionalleitung Hygiene, HELIOS Kliniken Mitte Nord, Bad Saarow, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the global increase in antibiotic resistance, the concept of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) has become increasingly important in recent years. Several publications have demonstrated the effectiveness of ABS, mainly in university facilities. This retrospective observational study describes the implementation of ABS in a basic care hospital. MATERIAL AND

methodsFollowing existing national guidelines, an ABS team was set up and measures were launched. These included: hospital guidelines, teaching, weekly antibiotic ward rounds and the restriction of definite substances. The preinterventional/postinterventional data analysis compared the use of antibiotics and blood culture sets as well as the development of resistance, infection with Clostridium difficile (CDI), costs, mortality and length of hospital stay.

resultsThe measures introduced led to a significant and continuous decline in total antibiotic use of initially 43 recommended daily doses (RDD)/100 patient days (PD) to 31 RDD/100 PD (p < 0.001). The largest decrease was observed in second generation (2G) cephalosporins (-67.5%), followed by 3G cephalosporins (-52.7%), carbapenems (-42.0%) and quinolones (-38.5%). The resistance rate of E. coli to 3G cephalosporins in blood cultures decreased from 26% to 9% (p = 0.021). The rate of blood cultures taken increased from 1.8 sets/100 PD to 3.2 sets/100 PD (+77%, p < 0.001). The pathogen detection rate, defined as one count when a minimum of one sample taken in a day is positive, also increased significantly from 4.0/1000 PD to 6.8/1000 PD (p < 0.001). The ABS had no effect on the overall mortality, the mean dwell time, and the preintervention low CDI incidence.

conclusionThe preinterventional/postinterventional comparison showed a significant reduction in the overall consumption of antibiotics with a redistribution in favor of antibiotics with a lower resistance selection. At the same time, the resistance rate of E. coli decreased. The increase of the blood culture rate indicates the optimization of diagnostic procedures. This ABS program had to be established with reduced resources but this seems to have been compensated by the more personal contact addressing the care takers and short chain of commands, as is possible in smaller hospitals. Presumably, the structure of basic care hospitals is particularly suitable for concepts covering entire hospitals. Further clusters of randomized studies are necessary to confirm this.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipCephalosporinsClostridioides difficileCross InfectionEscherichia coliHospitalsHumansRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsAntibiotic stewardshipBlood cultureCDIPrimary careResistance rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.