SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2018
Diagnostic accuracy of interleukin-6 and procalcitonin in patients with periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum versus synovial fluid interleukin-6 for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 diagnostic test accuracy studies.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- Synovial fluid calprotectin in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: A meta-analysis.International orthopaedics · 2022Pooled it
- Is combining serum interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein a reliable diagnostic tool in periprosthetic joint infections?Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Pooled it
- Meta-analysis in periprosthetic joint infection: a global bibliometric analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Pooled it
- Plasma fibrinogen in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Role of procalcitonin and interleukin-6 in early detection of infection in patients undergoing conversion from external fixation to definitive internal fixation in open fractures- A pilot study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy for Septic Arthritis Through Multivariate Analysis of Serum and Synovial Biomarkers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Culture, Histopathology, and mNGS for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Using Periprosthetic Tissue Samples: A Prospective Clinical Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Analysis of Serum and Synovial Inflammatory Markers in Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Diagnostic value of procalcitonin in patients with periprosthetic joint infection: a diagnostic meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Procalcitonin as a Predictor of Septic Knee Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023Article
- Article
- Phage Therapy for Limb-threatening Prosthetic Knee Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection: Case Report and In Vitro Characterization of Anti-biofilm Activity.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Article
- Diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing to detect periprosthetic joint infection.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Should all hip and knee prosthetic joints be aspirated prior to revision surgery?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2021Article
- Soluble Pecam-1 as a Biomarker in Periprosthetic Joint Infection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection.The bone & joint journal · 2021Article
- Combined serum biomarker analysis shows no benefit in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Serum globulin and albumin to globulin ratio as potential diagnostic biomarkers for periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMany studies have found associations between laboratory biomarkers and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but it remains unclear whether these biomarkers are clinically useful in ruling out PJI. This meta-analysis compared the performance of interleukin-6 (IL-6) versus procalcitonin (PCT) for the diagnosis of PJI.
methodsIn this meta-analysis, we reviewed studies that evaluated IL-6 or/and PCT as a diagnostic biomarker for PJI and provided sufficient data to permit sensitivity and specificity analyses for each test. The major databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched for appropriate studies from the earliest available date of indexing through February 28, 2017. No restrictions were placed on language of publication.
resultsWe identified 18 studies encompassing a total of 1,835 subjects; 16 studies reported on IL-6 and 6 studies reported on PCT. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95) for IL-6 and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.86) for PCT. The pooled sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.89) for IL-6 and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.31-0.81) for PCT. The pooled specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.95) for IL-6 and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.63-1.00) for PCT. Both the IL-6 and PCT tests had a high positive likelihood ratio (LR); 9.3 (95% CI, 5.3-16.2) and 12.4 (95% CI, 1.7-89.8), respectively, making them excellent rule-in tests for the diagnosis of PJI. The pooled negative LR for IL-6 was 0.19 (95% CI, 0.12-0.29), making it suitable as a rule-out test, whereas the pooled negative LR for PCT was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.25-0.78), making it unsuitable as a rule-out diagnostic tool.
conclusionsBased on the results of the present meta-analysis, IL-6 has higher diagnostic value than PCT for the diagnosis of PJI. Moreover, the specificity of the IL-6 test is higher than its sensitivity. Conversely, PCT is not recommended for use as a rule-out diagnostic tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.