Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29294142›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2018

Dose adjustment of cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide according to kidney function: a retrospective analysis and implications for medication safety.

Carolin Grafe, Sabine Semrau, Alexander Hein, Matthias W Beckmann, Andreas Mackensen, Frank Dörje, Martin F Fromm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Prescribing of anticancer drugs in renal impairment: why can't we do better?Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carolin GrafeInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Chair of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Fahrstraße 17, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Sabine SemrauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erlangen University Hospital, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Alexander HeinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 21, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias W BeckmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 21, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas MackensenDepartment of Medicine 5, Hematology and Oncology, Erlangen University Hospital, Ulmenweg 17, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Frank DörjePharmacy Department, Erlangen University Hospital, Palmsanlage 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Martin F FrommInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Chair of Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Fahrstraße 17, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. martin.fromm@fau.de.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Krebshilfe 110533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clearance of cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide depends on kidney function and dosages should be adjusted in patients with renal impairment. However, there is still limited data on the adherence of physicians to dosing recommendations for these drugs in cancer patients with renal impairment. Three thousand four hundred forty-eight prescriptions to 369 patients, treated in the Comprehensive Cancer Center of a German university hospital, were retrospectively evaluated. The administered relative doses of cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide were compared with relative doses recommended at the time of prescription according to the patients' creatinine clearance. Cisplatin is contraindicated according to two German summary of product characteristics (SmPC) in patients with a creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min. Nevertheless, 37 cisplatin prescriptions were made for this group of patients (i.e., 2.0% of all cisplatin prescriptions). According to one German SmPC (valid in the year of data analysis), etoposide dosage should be reduced in patients with a creatinine clearance from 15 to 50 mL/min, while it is contraindicated below 15 mL/min. Thirteen etoposide prescriptions were without dose reduction in patients with creatinine clearance from 15 to 50 mL/min (1.5% of all etoposide prescriptions); one patient received etoposide with creatinine clearance below 15 mL/min. In 8.9% of ifosfamide prescriptions, patients did not receive a reduced dose in spite of respective recommendations. Dosages of cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide are not always adjusted as recommended in patients with renal impairment. Consistent international dosing recommendations (e.g., in SmPCs), preferentially included in clinical decision support systems, should be developed to tackle this problem.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinCreatinineCross-Sectional StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEtoposideFemaleHumansIfosfamideKidneyMaleMiddle AgedCisplatinCreatinineEtoposideIfosfamideAdherence to renal dosing guidelinesCisplatinEtoposideIfosfamideRecommendations for dose adjustmentRenal impairment

Identifiers

PMID29294142
OpenAlexW2782401359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.