ArticleNucleic acids research2018
XPAT: a toolkit to conduct cross-platform association studies with heterogeneous sequencing datasets.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-wide assessment of rare protein-coding variants identifies associations with non-syndromic cleft lip/palate.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- An artificial intelligence optimized hepatic differentiation unveils NR5A2 and AP-1 transcriptional regulation in hepatic maturation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- An evaluation of genetic predisposition to congenital anomalies and pediatric cancer supportsGenetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Ultrarare Missense Variants Implicated in Utah Pedigrees Multiply Affected With Schizophrenia.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023Article
- Polygenic risk impacts PDGFRA mutation penetrance in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate.Human molecular genetics · 2022Article
- A whole-exome case-control association study to characterize the contribution of rare coding variation to pancreatic cancer risk.HGG advances · 2022Article
- Population-based targeted sequencing of 54 candidate genes identifiesJournal of medical genetics · 2021Article
- Integrated case-control and somatic-germline interaction analyses of melanoma susceptibility genes.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing data are increasingly being made available to the research community for secondary analyses, providing new opportunities for large-scale association studies. However, heterogeneity in target capture and sequencing technologies often introduce strong technological stratification biases that overwhelm subtle signals of association in studies of complex traits. Here, we introduce the Cross-Platform Association Toolkit, XPAT, which provides a suite of tools designed to support and conduct large-scale association studies with heterogeneous sequencing datasets. XPAT includes tools to support cross-platform aware variant calling, quality control filtering, gene-based association testing and rare variant effect size estimation. To evaluate the performance of XPAT, we conducted case-control association studies for three diseases, including 783 breast cancer cases, 272 ovarian cancer cases, 205 Crohn disease cases and 3507 shared controls (including 1722 females) using sequencing data from multiple sources. XPAT greatly reduced Type I error inflation in the case-control analyses, while replicating many previously identified disease-gene associations. We also show that association tests conducted with XPAT using cross-platform data have comparable performance to tests using matched platform data. XPAT enables new association studies that combine existing sequencing datasets to identify genetic loci associated with common diseases and other complex traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.