Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29294035›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2018

Innovative and New Approaches to Laboratory Diagnosis of Zika and Dengue: A Meeting Report.

Adriana Goncalves, Rosanna W Peeling, May C Chu, Duane J Gubler, Aravinda M de Silva, Eva Harris, Maurine Murtagh, Arlene Chua, William Rodriguez, Cassandra Kelly and 1 more

Abstract readConference ProceedingsHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Dengue and Zika Virus Diagnostic Testing for Patients with a Clinically Compatible Illness and Risk for Infection with Both Viruses.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Rapid diagnostic tests for determining dengue serostatus: a systematic review and key informant interviews.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Serological cross-reactivity among common flaviviruses.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adriana GoncalvesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Rosanna W PeelingLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
May C ChuDepartment of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora.
Duane J GublerEmerging Infectious Diseases Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Aravinda M de SilvaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Eva HarrisDivision of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Maurine MurtaghThe Murtagh Group, Palo, Alto, California.
Arlene ChuaWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerl.
William RodriguezFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerl.
Cassandra KellyFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerl.
Annelies Wilder-SmithLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore.

Funding

T Cell Responses Following DENV Natural Infections and Live-Attenuated Dengue Virus VaccinationP01AI106695 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Eva Harris · 2015 to 2026
$34.1M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI106695World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemics of dengue, Zika, and other arboviral diseases are increasing in frequency and severity. Current efforts to rapidly identify and manage these epidemics are limited by the short diagnostic window in acute infection, the extensive serologic cross-reactivity among flaviviruses, and the lack of point-of-care diagnostic tools to detect these viral species in primary care settings. The Partnership for Dengue Control organized a workshop to review the current landscape of Flavivirus diagnostic tools, identified current gaps, and developed strategies to accelerate the adoption of promising novel technologies into national programs. The rate-limiting step to bringing new diagnostic tools to the market is access to reference materials and well-characterized clinical samples to facilitate performance evaluation. We suggest the creation of an international laboratory-response consortium for flaviviruses with a decentralized biobank of well-characterized samples to facilitate assay validation. Access to proficiency panels are needed to ensure quality control, in additional to in-country capacity building.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralConsumer Product SafetyDengueDengue VirusEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansPopulation SurveillanceReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityZika VirusZika Virus InfectionAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID29294035
PMCPMC6279137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.