Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29293897›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2018

Aromatase inhibitors and the risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

F Khosrow-Khavar, H Yin, A Barkun, N Bouganim, L Azoulay

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Risk of de novo cancer after premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F Khosrow-KhavarCentre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
H YinCentre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
A BarkunDivision of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
N BouganimGerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
L AzoulayCentre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: laurent.azoulay@mcgill.ca.
McGill University · CAJewish General Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR FDN-333744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A large trial of postmenopausal women with breast cancer reported an imbalance in colorectal cancer events with aromatase inhibitors (AIs), compared with tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting. This unexpected signal was observed within 3 years of randomization. To date, no observational studies have examined this important safety question in the natural setting of clinical practice. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine whether AIs, when compared with tamoxifen, are associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Patients and methods: Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified women, at least 55 years of age, with breast cancer newly treated with either AIs or tamoxifen between 1 January 1996 and 30 September 2015, with follow-up until 30 September 2016. High-dimensional propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident colorectal cancer associated with AIs when compared with tamoxifen overall, by cumulative duration of use, and time since initiation. All exposures were lagged by 1 year for latency considerations. Results: A total of 9701 and 8893 patients initiated AIs and tamoxifen as first-line hormonal therapy (median follow-up of 2.4 and 2.9 years, respectively). Compared with tamoxifen, AIs were not associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (incidence rates of 150 per 100 000 person-years in both groups; adjusted HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.53-1.52). Similarly, there was no evidence of an association with cumulative duration of use (P-heterogeneity = 0.54), and time since initiation (P-heterogeneity = 0.66). Conclusions: In this first population-based study, the use of AIs was not associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. These findings should provide reassurance to the concerned stakeholders.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPostmenopauseRiskTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID29293897
PMCPMC5889043
OpenAlexW2781013411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.