Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29293890›Full record

SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2018

Busting the Myth of "Static vs Cidal": A Systemic Literature Review.

Noah Wald-Dickler, Paul Holtom, Brad Spellberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Repurposing Birabresib to target Gram‑positive bacteria.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Doxycycline forThe Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Legends, dogmas, presumptions, and demystifications in antibiotic therapy.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The role of innate immunity, antibiotics, and bacteriophages in the course of bacterial infections and their treatment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Static vs. cidal: it's not complex; it's simply incorrect.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noah Wald-DicklerLos Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center.
Paul HoltomLos Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center.
Brad SpellbergLos Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center.
Los Angeles Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

MAb Passive Vaccination against Acinetobacter baumanniiR01AI130060 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BRAD J SPELLBERG · 2017 to 2026
$6.7M
Transferrin Combination Therapy to Address Antimicrobial ResistanceR01AI117211 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SPELLBERG, BRAD J · 2016 to 2019
$2.7M
The Surface of Hospitals Intensive Environmental Load Disinfection (SHIELD) StudyR01HS025690 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SPELLBERG, BRAD J · 2017 to 2020
$1.8M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025690NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI117211NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to determine if clinical data validate the dogma that bactericidal antibiotics are more clinically effective than bacteriostatic agents. We performed a systematic literature review of published, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) that compared a bacteriostatic agent to a bactericidal agent in the treatment of clinical, bacterial infections. Of 56 identified trials published since 1985, 49 found no significant difference in efficacy between bacteriostatic and bactericidal agents. In 6 trials it was found that the bacteriostatic agent was superior to the bactericidal agent in efficacy. Only 1 trial found that the bactericidal agent was superior; in that case, the inferiority of the static agent was explainable by underdosing of the drug based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis. Thus, virtually all available data from high-quality, RCTs demonstrate no intrinsic superiority of bactericidal compared to bacteriostatic agents. Other drug characteristics such as optimal dosing, pharmacokinetics, and tissue penetration may be more important efficacy drivers.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29293890
PMCPMC5905615
OpenAlexW2778235567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.