Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29293876›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2018

Impact of homologous recombination deficiency biomarkers on outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (SWOG S9313).

P Sharma, W E Barlow, A K Godwin, H Pathak, K Isakova, D Williams, K M Timms, A R Hartman, R J Wenstrup, H M Linden and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

P SharmaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA. Electronic address: psharma2@kumc.edu.
W E BarlowSWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, USA; Cancer, Research and Biostatistics (CRAB), Seattle, USA.
A K GodwinDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
H PathakDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
K IsakovaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA.
D WilliamsMyriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, USA.
K M TimmsMyriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, USA.
A R HartmanMyriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, USA.
R J WenstrupMyriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, USA.
H M LindenDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, USA.
D TripathyDepartment of Breast Medical Onocolgy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
G N HortobagyiDepartment of Breast Medical Onocolgy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
D F HayesDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Myriad Genetics · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · USSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MEGAN OTHUS · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
Transgenic & Gene-Targeting Shared ResourceP30CA168524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NICOLE L NOLLEN · 2012 to 2026
$40.1M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP)U10CA180858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HUNT, KELLY K, PINNIX, CHELSEA CAMILLE · 2014 to 2018
$5.6M
UM LAPs- U10 GrantU10CA180801 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZALUPSKI, MARK M · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA168524NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180801NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180858NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-causing alterations have been reported in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesized that TNBCs with HRD alterations might be more sensitive to anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy and report on HRD status and BRCA1 promoter methylation (PM) as prognostic markers in TNBC patients treated with adjuvant doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) in SWOG9313. Patients and methods: In total, 425 TNBC patients were identified from S9313. HRD score, tumor BRCA1/2 sequencing, and BRCA1 PM were carried out on DNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Positive HRD status was defined as either a deleterious tumor BRCA1/2 (tBRCA) mutation or a pre-defined HRD score ≥42. Markers were tested for prognostic value on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression models adjusted for treatment assignment and nodal status. Results: HRD status was determined in 89% (379/425) of cases. Of these, 67% were HRD positive (27% with tBRCA mutation, 40% tBRCA-negative but HRD score ≥42). HRD-positive status was associated with a better DFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.00; P = 0.049] and non-significant trend toward better OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.48-1.03; P = 0.073). High HRD score (≥42) in tBRCA-negative patients (n = 274) was also associated with better DFS (HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.94; P = 0.023) and OS (HR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.42-1.00; P = 0.049). BRCA1 PM was evaluated successfully in 82% (348/425) and detected in 32% of cases. The DFS HR for BRCA1 PM was similar to that for HRD but did not reach statistical significance (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.54-1.17; P = 0.25). Conclusions: HRD positivity was observed in two-thirds of TNBC patients receiving adjuvant AC and was associated with better DFS. HRD status may identify TNBC patients who receive greater benefit from AC-based chemotherapy and should be evaluated further in prospective studies. Clinical Trials Number: Int0137 (The trial pre-dates Clinicaltrial.Gov website establishment).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinChemotherapy, AdjuvantCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinFemaleGenomic InstabilityHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedRecombinational DNA RepairTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanCyclophosphamideDoxorubicin

Identifiers

PMID29293876
PMCPMC5888953
OpenAlexW2779944044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.