Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29293806›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2017

Prospects for Genomic Selection in Cassava Breeding.

Marnin D Wolfe, Dunia Pino Del Carpio, Olumide Alabi, Lydia C Ezenwaka, Ugochukwu N Ikeogu, Ismail S Kayondo, Roberto Lozano, Uche G Okeke, Alfred A Ozimati, Esuma Williams and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Marnin D Wolfe
Dunia Pino Del Carpio
Olumide Alabi
Lydia C Ezenwaka
Ugochukwu N Ikeogu
Ismail S Kayondo
Roberto Lozano
Uche G Okeke
Alfred A Ozimati
Esuma Williams
Chiedozie Egesi
Robert S Kawuki
Peter Kulakow
Ismail Y Rabbi
Jean-Luc Jannink
Cornell University · USNational Agricultural Research Institute · UGInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture · NGInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture · NGNational Root Crops Research Institute · NGRobert W. Holley Center for Agriculture & Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cassava ( Crantz) is a clonally propagated staple food crop in the tropics. Genomic selection (GS) has been implemented at three breeding institutions in Africa to reduce cycle times. Initial studies provided promising estimates of predictive abilities. Here, we expand on previous analyses by assessing the accuracy of seven prediction models for seven traits in three prediction scenarios: cross-validation within populations, cross-population prediction and cross-generation prediction. We also evaluated the impact of increasing the training population (TP) size by phenotyping progenies selected either at random or with a genetic algorithm. Cross-validation results were mostly consistent across programs, with nonadditive models predicting of 10% better on average. Cross-population accuracy was generally low (mean = 0.18) but prediction of cassava mosaic disease increased up to 57% in one Nigerian population when data from another related population were combined. Accuracy across generations was poorer than within-generation accuracy, as expected, but accuracy for dry matter content and mosaic disease severity should be sufficient for rapid-cycling GS. Selection of a prediction model made some difference across generations, but increasing TP size was more important. With a genetic algorithm, selection of one-third of progeny could achieve an accuracy equivalent to phenotyping all progeny. We are in the early stages of GS for this crop but the results are promising for some traits. General guidelines that are emerging are that TPs need to continue to grow but phenotyping can be done on a cleverly selected subset of individuals, reducing the overall phenotyping burden.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPlant BreedingSelection, GeneticAfricaAlgorithmsCrops, AgriculturalManihot

Identifiers

PMID29293806
PMCPMC7822052
OpenAlexW2951374078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.