Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29293595›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A novel image registration approach via combining local features and geometric invariants.

Yan Lu, Kun Gao, Tinghua Zhang, Tingfa Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yan LuKey Lab of Photoelectronic Imaging Technology and System, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Kun GaoKey Lab of Photoelectronic Imaging Technology and System, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Tinghua ZhangKey Lab of Photoelectronic Imaging Technology and System, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Tingfa XuKey Lab of Photoelectronic Imaging Technology and System, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image registration is widely used in many fields, but the adaptability of the existing methods is limited. This work proposes a novel image registration method with high precision for various complex applications. In this framework, the registration problem is divided into two stages. First, we detect and describe scale-invariant feature points using modified computer vision-oriented fast and rotated brief (ORB) algorithm, and a simple method to increase the performance of feature points matching is proposed. Second, we develop a new local constraint of rough selection according to the feature distances. Evidence shows that the existing matching techniques based on image features are insufficient for the images with sparse image details. Then, we propose a novel matching algorithm via geometric constraints, and establish local feature descriptions based on geometric invariances for the selected feature points. Subsequently, a new price function is constructed to evaluate the similarities between points and obtain exact matching pairs. Finally, we employ the progressive sample consensus method to remove wrong matches and calculate the space transform parameters. Experimental results on various complex image datasets verify that the proposed method is more robust and significantly reduces the rate of false matches while retaining more high-quality feature points.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID29293595
PMCPMC5749792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.