Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29293516›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Sexual identity, attraction and behaviour in Britain: The implications of using different dimensions of sexual orientation to estimate the size of sexual minority populations and inform public health interventions.

Rebecca S Geary, Clare Tanton, Bob Erens, Soazig Clifton, Philip Prah, Kaye Wellings, Kirstin R Mitchell, Jessica Datta, Kirsten Gravningen, Elizabeth Fuller and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca S GearyInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Clare TantonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4612-1858
Bob ErensDepartment of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Soazig CliftonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Philip PrahInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kaye WellingsDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Kirstin R MitchellDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Jessica DattaDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Kirsten GravningenInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth FullerNatCen Social Research, London, United Kingdom.
Anne M JohnsonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Pam SonnenbergInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine H MercerInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNatCen Social Research · GBUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU11Medical Research Council G0701757Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/11Wellcome Trust 084840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexual orientation encompasses three dimensions: sexual identity, attraction and behaviour. There is increasing demand for data on sexual orientation to meet equality legislation, monitor potential inequalities and address public health needs. We present estimates of all three dimensions and their overlap in British men and women, and consider the implications for health services, research and the development and evaluation of public health interventions.

methodsAnalyses of data from Britain's third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles, a probability sample survey (15,162 people aged 16-74 years) undertaken in 2010-2012.

findingsA lesbian, gay or bisexual (LGB) identity was reported by 2·5% of men and 2·4% of women, whilst 6·5% of men and 11·5% of women reported any same-sex attraction and 5·5% of men and 6·1% of women reported ever experience of same-sex sex. This equates to approximately 547,000 men and 546,000 women aged 16-74 in Britain self-identifying as LGB and 1,204,000 men and 1,389,000 women ever having experience of same-sex sex. Of those reporting same-sex sex in the past 5 years, 28% of men and 45% of women identified as heterosexual.

interpretationThere is large variation in the size of sexual minority populations depending on the dimension applied, with implications for the design of epidemiological studies, targeting and monitoring of public health interventions and estimating population-based denominators. There is also substantial diversity on an individual level between identity, behaviour and attraction, adding to the complexity of delivering appropriate services and interventions.

Indexed as

Public Health PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsSexual BehaviorUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29293516
PMCPMC5749676
OpenAlexW2782502410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.