Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29293495›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

High throughput SNP discovery and genotyping in hexaploid wheat.

Hélène Rimbert, Benoît Darrier, Julien Navarro, Jonathan Kitt, Frédéric Choulet, Magalie Leveugle, Jorge Duarte, Nathalie Rivière, Kellye Eversole, International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
40.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A La Carte Seed Harvesting:Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Ancient diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hélène RimbertGDEC, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Benoît DarrierGDEC, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Julien NavarroGDEC, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jonathan KittGDEC, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Frédéric ChouletGDEC, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Magalie LeveugleBiogemma, Chappes, France.
Jorge DuarteBiogemma, Chappes, France.
Nathalie RivièreBiogemma, Chappes, France.
Kellye EversoleIWGSC, Eversole Associates, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium
Jacques Le GouisBreedWheat, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
on behalf The BreedWheat Consortium
Alessandro DavassiAffymetrix, High Wycombe, United Kingdom.
François BalfourierGDEC, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Marie-Christine Le PaslierEPGV US 1279, INRA, CEA, IG-CNG, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.
Aurélie BerardEPGV US 1279, INRA, CEA, IG-CNG, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.
Dominique BrunelEPGV US 1279, INRA, CEA, IG-CNG, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France.
Catherine FeuilletGDEC, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Charles PoncetGDEC, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Pierre SourdilleGDEC, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Etienne PauxGDEC, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-7129
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRBiogemma (France) · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FREversole Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of their abundance and their amenability to high-throughput genotyping techniques, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) are powerful tools for efficient genetics and genomics studies, including characterization of genetic resources, genome-wide association studies and genomic selection. In wheat, most of the previous SNP discovery initiatives targeted the coding fraction, leaving almost 98% of the wheat genome largely unexploited. Here we report on the use of whole-genome resequencing data from eight wheat lines to mine for SNPs in the genic, the repetitive and non-repetitive intergenic fractions of the wheat genome. Eventually, we identified 3.3 million SNPs, 49% being located on the B-genome, 41% on the A-genome and 10% on the D-genome. We also describe the development of the TaBW280K high-throughput genotyping array containing 280,226 SNPs. Performance of this chip was examined by genotyping a set of 96 wheat accessions representing the worldwide diversity. Sixty-nine percent of the SNPs can be efficiently scored, half of them showing a diploid-like clustering. The TaBW280K was proven to be a very efficient tool for diversity analyses, as well as for breeding as it can discriminate between closely related elite varieties. Finally, the TaBW280K array was used to genotype a population derived from a cross between Chinese Spring and Renan, leading to the construction a dense genetic map comprising 83,721 markers. The results described here will provide the wheat community with powerful tools for both basic and applied research.

Indexed as

GenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePolyploidyGenes, PlantPhylogenyTriticum

Identifiers

PMID29293495
PMCPMC5749704
OpenAlexW2549029187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.