Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29293372›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018

Bone lesion absorbed dose profiles in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with molecular radiotherapy.

Ana M Denis-Bacelar, Sarah J Chittenden, V Ralph McCready, Antigoni Divoli, David P Dearnaley, Joe M O'Sullivan, Bernadette Johnson, Glenn D Flux

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Differential responses toFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ana M Denis-Bacelar1 Chemical, Medical and Environmental Science Department, National Physical Laboratory , Teddington , UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0008-1598
Sarah J Chittenden2 Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
V Ralph McCready3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital , Brighton , UK.
Antigoni Divoli2 Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
David P Dearnaley4 Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Joe M O'Sullivan5 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , UK.
Bernadette Johnson4 Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Glenn D Flux2 Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
Royal Marsden Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBRoyal Sussex County Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10588Cancer Research UK 12518Cancer Research UK 19727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to calculate the range of absorbed doses that could potentially be delivered by a variety of radiopharmaceuticals and typical fixed administered activities used for bone pain palliation in a cohort of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The methodology for the extrapolation of the biodistribution, pharmacokinetics and absorbed doses from a given to an alternative radiopharmaceutical is presented.

methodsSequential single photon emission CT images from 22 patients treated with 5 GBq of

resultsThe median lesion absorbed doses across the patient cohort ranged from 2.7 Gy (range: 0.6-11.8 Gy) for 1100 MBq of

conclusionFor the patient cohort studied, a wide range of absorbed doses would have been delivered for typical administration protocols in mCRPC. The methodology presented has potential use for emerging theragnostic agents. Advances in knowledge: The same patient cohort can receive a range of lesion absorbed doses from typical molecular radiotherapy treatments for patients with metastatic prostate cancer, highlighting the need to establish absorbed dose response relationships and to treat patients according to absorbed dose instead of using fixed administered activities.

Indexed as

Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonBone NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicEtidronic AcidHumansMaleOrganometallic CompoundsProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation DosageRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiotherapy DosageStem Cell TransplantationTissue DistributionEtidronic AcidOrganometallic CompoundsRadiopharmaceuticalsrhenium-186 HEDP

Identifiers

PMID29293372
PMCPMC5966004
OpenAlexW2782138244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.