Trial reportJournal of pediatric hematology/oncology2018
Excellent Outcomes Following Response-based Omission of Radiotherapy in Children and Adolescents With Intermediate or High-risk Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Trial report in Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcome and Challenges in the Treatment of Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma With Euronet-PHL-C1 Protocol: Experience From a Resource-Limited Country.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: From Past to Future-A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Advances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Several pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) consortia have demonstrated safe omission of radiotherapy (RT) in early stage HL, whereas feasibility of omitting RT in advanced HL is still under investigation. This is a single institution retrospective analysis of 27 patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk HL (age 22 y and younger), treated with a modification of the dose-intensive OEPA-COPDAC (vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, dacarbazine) regimen, with radiation restricted to only sites of inadequate early response (Deauville ≥3 and/or ≤75% tumor shrinkage). Their outcome was compared with a historical cohort (n=42) treated with Stanford V or ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine), who received consolidative involved-field RT. RT was omitted in 15 of 27 (56%) of patients treated with OEPA-COPDAC, majority of whom (67%) had high-risk disease. At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, the 3-year progression-free survival was 100% in patients who received OEPA-COPDAC, versus 83.3% (95% confidence interval, 68.2%-91.7%) in the historical cohort, P=0.03. Our analysis demonstrates excellent survival with omission of RT in more than 50% of patients with pediatric advanced HL, treated with a dose-intensive chemotherapy regimen. When administered, RT was restricted to only sites of inadequate early response. Results of large prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.