Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29292359›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

The numerical abilities of anurans and their neural correlates: insights from neuroethological studies of acoustic communication.

Gary J Rose

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Periodicity Pitch Perception.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Counting insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  16. Introduction: The origins of numerical abilities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gary J RoseDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA rose@bioscience.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1376-6737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic communication is important in the reproductive behaviour of anurans. The acoustic repertoire of most species consists of several call types, but some anurans gradually increase the complexity of their calls during aggressive interactions between males and when approached by females. In these interactions, males may closely match the number of calls or notes in a sequence that a neighbour produces, thereby revealing their numerical abilities. Anurans are also able to discern the number of sequential properly timed pulses (notes). The temporal intervals between successive pulses provide information about species identity and call type. A neural correlate of this numerical ability is evident in the responses of 'interval-counting' neurons, which show 'tuning' for intermediate to fast pulse rates and respond only after at least a threshold number of pulses have occurred with the correct timing. A single interpulse interval that is two to three times the optimal value can reset this interval-counting process. Whole-cell recordings from midbrain neurons,

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionComprehensionVocalization, AnimalAnimalsAnuraNeuronsPatch-Clamp Techniquesacoustic communicationauditorycall matchingfrogsinferior colliculusinterval-counting neurons

Identifiers

PMID29292359
PMCPMC5784039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.