Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29292023›Full record

ReviewFood and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association2018

Status of microbial based cleaning products in statutory regulations and ecolabelling in Europe, the USA, and Canada.

Armin Spök, George Arvanitakis, Gwendolyn McClung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Risk analysis approaches for microbial ingredients in microbial-based cleaning products.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  3. The indoors microbiome and human health.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Armin SpökGraz University of Technology and Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt, Wien-Graz, Schlögelgasse 2, A-8010, Graz, Austria. Electronic address: armin.spoek@tugraz.at.
George ArvanitakisNew Substances Assessment and Control Bureau, Health Canada, 269 Laurier Ave. West123 Slater Street, A.L. 4905B 3505A, K1A 0K9, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Gwendolyn McClungOffice of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington DC, 20460, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USGraz University of Technology · ATHealth Canada · CA

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cleaning products containing living microorganisms as active ingredients are increasingly being used in household, professional and industrial cleaning applications. Microorganisms can degrade soiling associated with dirt, food residues, and grease by enzymatic and metabolic action and out-compete microorganisms associated with odor problems. Their potential for odor control seems to result in a competitive advantage over conventional chemically-based cleaning products. Moreover, producers of microbial-based cleaning products (MBCPs) claim that their products are less harmful to the environment. These promising prospects have triggered interest from consumer and environmental organizations, professional users, and regulators in understanding if there are also possible negative health and environmental impacts which require attention and how the safety of these products is ensured. Unfortunately, there is little information on these issues in the public domain. Moreover, regulatory oversight in Europe is essentially limited to pathogenic properties in the context of worker protection. Canada, in contrast, has a regulatory framework in place to assess risks to human health and the environment from the manufacture, import and/or use of new microorganisms contained in MBCPs. In the absence of mandatory standards, safety assessment and hygienic practices seem to vary considerably across companies. Recently developed ecolabelling standards are - for the time being - the only option for transparent compliance to minimum standards in terms of safety as well as assessments of manufacturer information by third parties. These standards highlight in particular the need for precise taxonomic information for assessing the pathogenic properties and the need to ensure the absence of potentially harmful microorganisms as contaminants. Ecolabelling standards are, however, voluntary and do not cover all relevant safety issues. In order to develop a more comprehensive set of mandatory standards for health and safety, a number of areas would benefit from further research (e.g. the role in plant pathogenicity and other environmental properties of the microorganisms used; the relevance of chronic exposure to dusts and aerosols containing vegetative cells and spores; the relevance of strains which belong to species known to include opportunistic pathogens and possible hazards for particularly sensitive risk groups). Improved knowledge in these areas will contribute to a predictable level of product safety.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiological FactorsCanadaDetergentsEuropeHumansProduct LabelingRisk AssessmentUnited StatesBiological FactorsDetergentsEcolabellingMBCPsMicrobial based cleaning productsMicrobial cleanerProbiotic cleanerRisk assessmentRisk managementSafety assessment

Identifiers

PMID29292023
PMCPMC6691958
OpenAlexW2776682133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.