Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29291719›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Improving zebrafish embryo xenotransplantation conditions by increasing incubation temperature and establishing a proliferation index with ZFtool.

Pablo Cabezas-Sainz, Jorge Guerra-Varela, María J Carreira, Javier Mariscal, María Roel, Juan A Rubiolo, Andrés A Sciara, Miguel Abal, Luis M Botana, Rafael López and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Zebrafish live imaging: a strong weapon in anticancer drug discovery and development.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Zebrafish Models of Paediatric Brain Tumours.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Pablo Cabezas-SainzDepartament of Zoology, Genetics and Physical Anthropology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain.
Jorge Guerra-VarelaDepartament of Zoology, Genetics and Physical Anthropology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain.
María J CarreiraInvestigation Center of Information Technologies (CiTIUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Javier MariscalTranslational Laboratory, Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela/SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María RoelDepartment of Pharmacology, Veterinary Faculty, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain.
Juan A RubioloDepartament of Zoology, Genetics and Physical Anthropology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain.
Andrés A SciaraMolecular and Cellular Biology Institute of Rosario (IBR-COCINET) - Biochemistry and Pharmaceutics Science Faculty, National Rosario University, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Miguel AbalTranslational Laboratory, Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela/SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Luis M BotanaDepartment of Pharmacology, Veterinary Faculty, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain.
Rafael LópezTranslational Laboratory, Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela/SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Laura SánchezDepartament of Zoology, Genetics and Physical Anthropology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, Spain. lauraelena.sanchez@usc.es.
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario · ARServicio Gallego de Salud · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI13/01388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZebrafish (Danio rerio) is a model organism that has emerged as a tool for cancer research, cancer being the second most common cause of death after cardiovascular disease for humans in the developed world. Zebrafish is a useful model for xenotransplantation of human cancer cells and toxicity studies of different chemotherapeutic compounds in vivo. Compared to the murine model, the zebrafish model is faster, can be screened using high-throughput methods and has a lower maintenance cost, making it possible and affordable to create personalized therapies. While several methods for cell proliferation determination based on image acquisition and quantification have been developed, some drawbacks still remain. In the xenotransplantation technique, quantification of cellular proliferation in vivo is critical to standardize the process for future preclinical applications of the model.

methodsThis study improved the conditions of the xenotransplantation technique - quantification of cellular proliferation in vivo was performed through image processing with our ZFtool software and optimization of temperature in order to standardize the process for a future preclinical applications. ZFtool was developed to establish a base threshold that eliminates embryo auto-fluorescence and measures the area of marked cells (GFP) and the intensity of those cells to define a 'proliferation index'.

resultsThe analysis of tumor cell proliferation at different temperatures (34 °C and 36 °C) in comparison to in vitro cell proliferation provides of a better proliferation rate, achieved as expected at 36°, a maintenance temperature not demonstrated up to now. The mortality of the embryos remained between 5% and 15%. 5- Fluorouracil was tested for 2 days, dissolved in the incubation medium, in order to quantify the reduction of the tumor mass injected. In almost all of the embryos incubated at 36 °C and incubated with 5-Fluorouracil, there was a significant tumor cell reduction compared with the control group. This was not the case at 34 °C.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that the proliferation of the injected cells is better at 36 °C and that this temperature is the most suitable for testing chemotherapeutic drugs like the 5-Fluorouracil.

Indexed as

SoftwareAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell ProliferationDisease Models, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEmbryo, NonmammalianGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansNeoplasmsTemperatureTransplantation, HeterologousTumor Cells, CulturedZebrafishAntineoplastic Agentsenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent Proteins5-fuCancerProliferationTemperatureXenograftZebrafishZFtool

Identifiers

PMID29291719
PMCPMC5748948
OpenAlexW2781813016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.