ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Simulating autosomal genotypes with realistic linkage disequilibrium and a spiked-in genetic effect.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A method for finding epistatic effects of maternal and fetal variants.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Genomic Predictions Cross Populations with Different Linkage Disequilibrium Patterns.Genes · 2024Article
- SimHOEPI: A resampling simulator for generating single nucleotide polymorphism data with a high-order epistasis model.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- GADGETS: a genetic algorithm for detecting epistasis using nuclear families.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- PGsim: A Comprehensive and Highly Customizable Personal Genome Simulator.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Theoretical Evaluation of Multi-Breed Genomic Prediction in Chinese Indigenous Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- simGWAS: a fast method for simulation of large scale case-control GWAS summary statistics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate statistical methods for genome-wide genetic analyses, one needs to be able to simulate realistic genotypes. We here describe a method, applicable to a broad range of association study designs, that can simulate autosome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism data with realistic linkage disequilibrium and with spiked in, user-specified, single or multi-SNP causal effects.
resultsOur construction uses existing genome-wide association data from unrelated case-parent triads, augmented by including a hypothetical complement triad for each triad (same parents but with a hypothetical offspring who carries the non-transmitted parental alleles). We assign offspring qualitative or quantitative traits probabilistically through a specified risk model and show that our approach destroys the risk signals from the original data. Our method can simulate genetically homogeneous or stratified populations and can simulate case-parents studies, case-control studies, case-only studies, or studies of quantitative traits. We show that allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium structure in the original genome-wide association sample are preserved in the simulated data. We have implemented our method in an R package (TriadSim) which is freely available at the comprehensive R archive network.
conclusionWe have proposed a method for simulating genome-wide SNP data with realistic linkage disequilibrium. Our method will be useful for developing statistical methods for studying genetic associations, including higher order effects like epistasis and gene by environment interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.