ArticleeNeuro
Pseudoneglect in Visual Search: Behavioral Evidence and Connectional Constraints in Simulated Neural Circuitry.
Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attentional biases, as measured by motion-induced blindness, are linked to schizophrenia traits.PloS one · 2025Article
- Sustained attention and the flash grab effect.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Article
- Fronto-parietal networks shape human conscious report through attention gain and reorienting.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Top-down control of the left visual field bias in cued visual spatial attention.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Dynamic changes in spatial representation within the posterior parietal cortex in response to visuomotor adaptation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- When neuro-robots go wrong: A review.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023Review
- Gaze-contingent display technology can help to reduce the ipsilesional attention bias in hemispatial neglect following stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Indexes for the E-Baking Tray Task: A Look on Laterality, Verticality and Quality of Exploration.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Connectivity alterations underlying the breakdown of pseudoneglect: New insights from healthy and pathological aging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Behavioral Restriction Determines Left Attentional Bias: Preliminary Evidences From COVID-19 Lockdown.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Further to the Left: Stress-Induced Increase of Spatial Pseudoneglect During the COVID-19 Lockdown.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Neurorobots as a Means Toward Neuroethology and Explainable AI.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2020Review
- Unbalancing the Attentional Priority MapFrontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- The Development of Spatial Memory Analyzed by Means of Ecological Walking Task.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most people tend to bisect horizontal lines slightly to the left of their true center (pseudoneglect) and start visual search from left-sided items. This physiological leftward spatial bias may depend on hemispheric asymmetries in the organization of attentional networks, but the precise mechanisms are unknown. Here, we modeled relevant aspects of the ventral and dorsal attentional networks (VAN and DAN) of the human brain. First, we demonstrated pseudoneglect in visual search in 101 right-handed psychology students. Participants consistently tended to start the task from a left-sided item, thus showing pseudoneglect. Second, we trained populations of simulated neurorobots to perform a similar task, by using a genetic algorithm. The neurorobots' behavior was controlled by artificial neural networks, which simulated the human VAN and DAN in the two brain hemispheres. Neurorobots differed in the connectional constraints that were applied to the anatomy and function of the attention networks. Results indicated that (1) neurorobots provided with a biologically plausible hemispheric asymmetry of the VAN-DAN connections, as well as with interhemispheric inhibition, displayed the best match with human data; however; (2) anatomical asymmetry per se was not sufficient to generate pseudoneglect; in addition, the VAN must have an excitatory influence on the ipsilateral DAN; and (3) neurorobots provided with bilateral competence in the VAN but without interhemispheric inhibition failed to display pseudoneglect. These findings provide a proof of concept of the causal link between connectional asymmetries and pseudoneglect and specify important biological constraints that result in physiological asymmetries of human behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.