Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29291103›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Method to improve the survival of night-swarming mayflies near bridges in areas of distracting light pollution.

Ádám Egri, Dénes Száz, Alexandra Farkas, Ádám Pereszlényi, Gábor Horváth, György Kriska

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ádám EgriMTA Centre for Ecological Research, Danube Research Institute, 1113 Budapest, Karolina út 29-31, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2075-1154
Dénes SzázEnvironmental Optics Laboratory, Department of Biological Physics, Physical Institute, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Pázmány sétány 1, Hungary.
Alexandra FarkasMTA Centre for Ecological Research, Danube Research Institute, 1113 Budapest, Karolina út 29-31, Hungary.
Ádám PereszlényiEnvironmental Optics Laboratory, Department of Biological Physics, Physical Institute, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Pázmány sétány 1, Hungary.
Gábor HorváthEnvironmental Optics Laboratory, Department of Biological Physics, Physical Institute, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Pázmány sétány 1, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9008-2411
György KriskaMTA Centre for Ecological Research, Danube Research Institute, 1113 Budapest, Karolina út 29-31, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous negative ecological effects of urban lighting have been identified during the last decades. In spite of the development of lighting technologies, the detrimental effect of this form of light pollution has not declined. Several insect species are affected including the night-swarming mayfly

Indexed as

ecological light trapsEphoron virgolight pollutionnature conservationphototaxisvisual ecology

Identifiers

PMID29291103
PMCPMC5717677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.