Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29291063›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Explaining large mitochondrial sequence differences within a population sample.

Mary Morgan-Richards, Mariana Bulgarella, Louisa Sivyer, Edwina J Dowle, Marie Hale, Natasha E McKean, Steven A Trewick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Complete mitochondrial genome of the razor-backed musk turtle (Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  4. Spatial Variation ofInsects · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary Morgan-RichardsEcology, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3913-9814
Mariana BulgarellaEcology, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Louisa SivyerEcology, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Edwina J DowleDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado, 1151 Arapahoe, SI 2071, Denver, CO 80204, USA.
Marie HaleSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Natasha E McKeanEcology, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Steven A TrewickEcology, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA sequence is frequently used to infer species' boundaries, as divergence is relatively rapid when populations are reproductively isolated. However, the shared history of a non-recombining gene naturally leads to correlation of pairwise differences, resulting in mtDNA clusters that might be mistaken for evidence of multiple species. There are four distinct processes that can explain high levels of mtDNA sequence difference within a single sample. Here, we examine one case in detail as an exemplar to distinguish among competing hypotheses. Within our sample of tree wētā (

Indexed as

constraining selectionDNA barcodinggenetic driftHemideinamtDNA divergencepopulation size

Identifiers

PMID29291063
PMCPMC5717637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.