Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29291026›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Can Kushen injection combined with TACE improve therapeutic efficacy and safety in patients with advanced HCC? a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Yingshi Zhang, Fuhai Hui, Yue Yang, Haixiao Chu, Xiaochun Qin, Mingyi Zhao, Qingchun Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yingshi ZhangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, P.R. China.
Fuhai HuiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, P.R. China.
Yue YangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, P.R. China.
Haixiao ChuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, P.R. China.
Xiaochun QinDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, P.R. China.
Mingyi ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, P.R. China.
Qingchun ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the comparative efficacy and safety of combination treatment with Compound Kushen Injection (CKI) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through a systematic review and network meta-analysis and to identify the best conditions for using CKI. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. We searched databases for studies published by August 2017. The prespecified primary efficacy outcome was treatment response, while the secondary efficacy outcomes were KPS score, Child-Pugh score, overall survival rate, clinical symptoms, and improvements in immune function and liver function; we performed subgroup analyses and meta-regressions according to the different TACE arms, CKI dosage, composition of CKI, embolizing agents and treatment duration. The safety outcomes were side effects. We conducted pairwise meta-analyses using a random-effects model and then performed random-effects network meta-analyses.

resultsA total of 44 trials, involving 3778 patients and 22 intervention arms, were eligible. TACE+CKI could significantly increase treatment response (1.85, 1.56 to 2.20) and improve therapeutic efficacy based on the secondary outcomes. Significant efficacy was observed in most subgroups. Network meta-analysis revealed that CKI was very suitable for combination treatment when the TACE arm included 5-fluorouracil+epirubicin+hydroxycamptothecin, pirarubicin+hydroxycamptothecin and 5-fluorouracil+pirarubicin+mitomycin+hydroxycamptothecin. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017073181).

conclusionsRegarding efficacy, TACE+CKI offers clear advantages for patients with advanced HCC. Moreover, patients should be encouraged to accept CKI, especially when the chemotherapeutic drugs in TACE have high levels of adriamycins (epirubicin and pirarubicin) and hydroxycamptothecin.

Indexed as

advanced hepatocellular carcinomacompound Kushen injectionnetwork meta-analysisTACEtransarterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID29291026
PMCPMC5739811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.