Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29290959›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Circulating tumor cells: potential markers of minimal residual disease in ovarian cancer? a study of the OVCAD consortium.

Eva Obermayr, Natalia Bednarz-Knoll, Beatrice Orsetti, Heinz-Ulrich Weier, Sandrina Lambrechts, Dan Cacsire Castillo-Tong, Alexander Reinthaller, Elena Ioana Braicu, Sven Mahner, Jalid Sehouli and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Diagnostic biomarkers in ovarian cancer: advances beyond CA125 and HE4.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Detection ofCancers · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Eva ObermayrDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Natalia Bednarz-KnollInstitute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Beatrice OrsettiINSERM U1194, IRCM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Heinz-Ulrich WeierDepartment of Cancer and DNA Damage Responses, Life Sciences Division, University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Sandrina LambrechtsDivision of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dan Cacsire Castillo-TongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander ReinthallerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Elena Ioana BraicuDepartment of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sven MahnerDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jalid SehouliDepartment of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ignace VergoteDivision of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Charles TheilletINSERM U1194, IRCM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Robert ZeillingerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Burkhard BrandtInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Medical University of Vienna · ATCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKU Leuven · BEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEClinical Research Center Kiel · DEInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn 75% of ovarian cancer patients the tumor mass is completely eradicated by established surgical and cytotoxic treatment; however, the majority of the tumors recur within 24 months. Here we investigated the role of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) indicating occult tumor load, which remains inaccessible by established diagnostics. EXPERIMENTAL

designBlood was taken at diagnosis (baseline samples,

resultsCTCs were observed in 26.5% baseline and 7.7% follow-up blood samples at a mean number of 12.4 and 2.8 CTCs per ml blood, respectively. Baseline CTCs indicated a higher risk of death in R0 patients with complete gross resection (univariate: HR 2.158, 95% CI 1.111-4.191,

conclusionsOur data suggest that CTCs detected by the multi-marker protein panel and/or MECOM/HHLA1 FISH represent minimal residual disease in optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients. The role of CTCs cells especially for clinical therapy stratification of the patients has to be validated in consecutive larger studies applying standardized treatment schemes.

Indexed as

circulating tumour cellsFISH on CTCsminimal residual diseasemulti-marker analysisovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID29290959
PMCPMC5739744
OpenAlexW2768481378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.