ReviewTheranostics2018
Current Challenges of Cancer Anti-angiogenic Therapy and the Promise of Nanotherapeutics.
Review in Theranostics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
102 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors combined with antiangiogenic agents in the maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors for recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta‑analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Pooled it
- The efficacy and toxicity of angiogenesis inhibitors for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Pooled it
- Combined all-trans retinoic acid with low-dose apatinib in treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma: A single-center, secondary analysis of a phase II study.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Tumor microenvironment-rearranging Nanoassemblies overcome angiogenesis-immunotherapy resistance to potentiate osteosarcoma treatment.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Assessing axitinib-induced differential responses in tumor vascularization and oxygenation with combined optoacoustic angiography and diffuse optical spectroscopy.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- The vascular niche: an orchestrator of the spatiotemporal dynamics of distant metastasis.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Nanoparticles Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment for the Treatment of Osteosarcoma: Recent Progress and Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Metabolic reprogramming and functional crosstalk within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and A Multi-omics anticancer approach.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Nanotherapeutic Formulations for the Delivery of Cancer Antiangiogenics.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Interrogation of the tumor microenvironment by nanoparticles.Cancer letters · 2025Review
- Article
- A targetable OSGIN1 - AMPK - SLC2A3 axis controls the vulnerability of ovarian cancer to ferroptosis.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Application of Nanotechnology in TACE Treatment of Liver Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Strategies to Combat Resistance to Anti-angiogenesis Therapies in Cancer: Current Status and Future Prospects.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- L-Threonine-Derived Biodegradable Polyurethane Nanoparticles for Sustained Carboplatin Release.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Review
- Combination of anlotinib and second-line chemotherapy as surrogate to reduce immunosuppression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Anti‑angiogenic and cytotoxic evaluation of green‑synthesized FeBiomedical reports · 2024Article
- High-throughput barcoding of nanoparticles identifies cationic, degradable lipid-like materials for mRNA delivery to the lungs in female preclinical models.Nature communications · 2024Article
42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With growing interest in cancer therapeutics, anti-angiogenic therapy has received considerable attention and is widely administered in several types of human cancers. Nonetheless, this type of therapy may induce multiple signaling pathways compared with cytotoxics and lead to worse outcomes in terms of resistance, invasion, metastasis, and overall survival (OS). Moreover, there are important challenges that limit the translation of promising biomarkers into clinical practice to monitor the efficiency of anti-angiogenic therapy. These pitfalls emphasize the urgent need for discovering alternative angiogenic inhibitors that target multiple angiogenic factors or developing a new drug delivery system for the current inhibitors. The great advantages of nanoparticles are their ability to offer effective routes that target the biological system and regulate different vital processes based on their unique features. Limited studies so far have addressed the effectiveness of nanoparticles in the normalization of the delicate balance between stimulating (pro-angiogenic) and inhibiting (anti-angiogenic) factors. In this review, we shed light on tumor vessels and their microenvironment and consider the current directions of anti-angiogenic and nanotherapeutic treatments. To the best of our knowledge, we consider an important effort in the understanding of anti-angiogenic agents (often a small volume of metals, nonmetallic molecules, or polymers) that can control the growth of new vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.