Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29290554›Full record

ArticleNeuron2018

A Non-canonical Reticular-Limbic Central Auditory Pathway via Medial Septum Contributes to Fear Conditioning.

Guang-Wei Zhang, Wen-Jian Sun, Brian Zingg, Li Shen, Jufang He, Ying Xiong, Huizhong W Tao, Li I Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Survey of Hippocampal Responses to Sound in Naive Mice Reveals Widespread Activation by Broadband Noise Onsets.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rough is salient: a conserved vocal niche to hijack the brain's salience system.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guang-Wei ZhangDepartment of Neurobiology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Third Military Medical University, 30 Gaotanyan St., Chongqing, 400038, China; Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Wen-Jian SunZilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Department of Biology and Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Brian ZinggZilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Li ShenZilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Jufang HeDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Ying XiongDepartment of Neurobiology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Third Military Medical University, 30 Gaotanyan St., Chongqing, 400038, China. Electronic address: yxiong@tmmu.edu.cn.
Huizhong W TaoZilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Electronic address: htao@usc.edu.
Li I ZhangZilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Electronic address: liizhang@usc.edu.

Funding

Processing and transformation of visual signals in the superior colliculusR01EY019049 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TAO, HUIZHONG WHIT · 2008 to 2025
$9.2M
Thalamic Modulation of Auditory Cortical Processing via LPR01DC008983 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Li I Zhang · 2007 to 2026
$8.7M
Integrative approach to classifying neuronal cell types of the mouse hippocampusRF1MH114112 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DONG, HONG-WEI, ZHANG, LI I · 2017 to 2017
$4.2M
Novel fluorescent sensors based on GPCRs for imaging neuromodulationU01NS103558 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HIRES, SAMUEL ANDREW, LI, YULONG · 2017 to 2019
$2.2M
Synaptic circuitry mechanisms underlying functional development of visual cortexR01EY025722 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TAO, HUIZHONG WHIT · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
Inhibitory circuitry mechanisms underlying visual cortical development and plastiR21EY022478 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TAO, HUIZHONG WHIT · 2012 to 2013
$441k
Functional Properties of Subclasses of Layer 5 Projection Neurons in Auditory CortexF31DC015185 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ZINGG, BRIAN · 2015 to 2017
$131k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019049NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025722NEI NIH HHS R21 EY022478NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC015185NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008983NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH114112NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS103558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the mammalian brain, auditory information is known to be processed along a central ascending pathway leading to auditory cortex (AC). Whether there exist any major pathways beyond this canonical auditory neuraxis remains unclear. In awake mice, we found that auditory responses in entorhinal cortex (EC) cannot be explained by a previously proposed relay from AC based on response properties. By combining anatomical tracing and optogenetic/pharmacological manipulations, we discovered that EC received auditory input primarily from the medial septum (MS), rather than AC. A previously uncharacterized auditory pathway was then revealed: it branched from the cochlear nucleus, and via caudal pontine reticular nucleus, pontine central gray, and MS, reached EC. Neurons along this non-canonical auditory pathway responded selectively to high-intensity broadband noise, but not pure tones. Disruption of the pathway resulted in an impairment of specifically noise-cued fear conditioning. This reticular-limbic pathway may thus function in processing aversive acoustic signals.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysAvoidance LearningAxonal TransportCochlear NucleusConditioning, ClassicalCuesEntorhinal CortexFearGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLimbic SystemMiceNoisePonsGreen Fluorescent Proteinsauditory fear conditioningbasal forebrainentorhinal cortexlemniscal and nonlemniscal auditory pathwaylimbic systemreticular formationseptum complex

Identifiers

PMID29290554
PMCPMC5798467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.