ArticleLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2018
Stereotactic body radiation therapy for isolated hilar and mediastinal non-small cell lung cancers.
Article in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of stereotactic body radiotherapy for nodal metastases.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2021Pooled it
- Can high-risk CT features suggest local recurrence after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Outcome and safety of SBRT in centrally and ultra-centrally located lung tumours: A PRISMA-based systematic review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Multi-institutional study using sbrt to treat mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2024Article
- Ten fraction hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for the management of ultracentral lung tumors: a retrospective analysis of dosimetry, outcomes, and toxicity.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of lymph node metastases: a retrospective mono-institutional study in a large cohort of patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- Developments in radiation techniques for thoracic malignancies.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Review
- Outcomes with multi-disciplinary management of central lung tumors with CT-guided percutaneous high dose rate brachyablation.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021Article
- A single institutional experience with central lung stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrating encouraging results with increased inter-fraction time.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for central and ultracentral node-negative lung tumors.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- Stereobody radiotherapy for nodal recurrences in oligometastatic patients: a pooled analysis from two phase I clinical trials.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2020Article
- Low-dose hilar and mediastinal stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Analysis of outcomes in patients receiving one or multiple courses of treatment.Thoracic cancer · 2020Article
- Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for malignant mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy: a systematic review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
- Optimized CyberKnife Lung Treatment: Effect of Fractionated Tracking Volume Change on Tracking Results.Disease markers · 2020Article
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus fractionated radiation therapy for early-stage bronchopulmonary carcinoid.Lung cancer management · 2019Article
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy in early-stage NSCLC: historical review, contemporary evidence and future implications.Lung cancer management · 2019Review
- The evolving toxicity profile of SBRT for lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2019Review
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy for central lung tumors: Finding the balance between safety and efficacy in the "no fly" zone.Thoracic cancer · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe seminal phase II trial for pulmonary stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) suggested that SBRT to central lesions resulted in unacceptable toxicity. Alternative dose-fractionation schemes have been proposed which may improve safety without compromise of efficacy. We report our institutional outcomes of SBRT for hilar/mediastinal non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review was conducted of patients with NSCLC in a hilar or mediastinal nodal station which was treated with SBRT. Patients presented with a lesion involving the hilum or mediastinum from primary or oligorecurrent NSCLC. Kaplan-Meier with log-rank testing and Cox analysis were utilized for outcomes analysis.
resultsFrom 2008-2015, 40 patients with median age of 70 were treated with SBRT for primary/oligorecurrent hilar/mediastinal NSCLC with median follow-up of 16.4 months. 85% presented with oligorecurrent disease at a median of 22.4 months following definitive therapy. The aortico-pulmonary window was the target in 40%, the hilum in 25%, lower paratracheal in 20%, subcarinal in 10%, and prevascular in 5%. The median dose was 48Gy in 4 fractions (range: 35-48Gy in 4-5 fractions). Median overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survivals were 22.7 and 13.1 months, respectively. Two-year local control was 87.7% and not significantly different between hilar and mediastinal targets. Median PFS was significantly improved in patients with hilar vs mediastinal nodal targets: 33.3 vs 8.4 months, respectively (p=0.031). OS was not statistically different between hilar and mediastinal targets (p=0.359). On multivariable analysis, hilar vs mediastinal target predicted for PFS (HR 3.045 95%CI [1.044-8.833], p=0.042), as did shorter time to presentation in patients with oligorecurrence (HR 0.983 [95%CI 0.967-1.000], p=0.049). Acute grade 3+ morbidity was seen in 3 patients (hemoptysis, pericardial/pleural effusion, heart failure) and late grade 3+ morbidity (hemoptysis) in 1 patient.
conclusionHilar/mediastinal SBRT appears to be a safe technique for the local control of isolated nodal disease with limited toxicity from the fractionation schemes utilized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29290248What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.