Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29290047›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2018

Predictive modeling of inpatient mortality in departments of internal medicine.

Naama Schwartz, Ali Sakhnini, Naiel Bisharat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hypoalbuminemia as Surrogate and Culprit of Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naama SchwartzResearch Authority, Emek Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, Afula, Israel.
Ali SakhniniDepartment of Medicine D, Emek Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, 21 Rabin Avenue, 18341, Afula, Israel.
Naiel BisharatDepartment of Medicine D, Emek Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, 21 Rabin Avenue, 18341, Afula, Israel. bisharat_na@clalit.org.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite overwhelming data on predictors of inpatient mortality, it is unclear which variables are the most instructive in predicting mortality of patients in departments of internal medicine. This study aims to identify the most informative predictors of inpatient mortality, and builds a prediction model on an individual level, given a constellation of patient characteristics. We use a penalized method for developing the prediction model by applying the least-absolute-shrinkage and selection-operator regression. We utilize a cohort of adult patients admitted to any of 5 departments of internal medicine during 3.5 years. We integrated data from electronic health records that included clinical, epidemiological, administrative, and laboratory variables. The prediction model was evaluated using the validation sample. Of 10,788 patients hospitalized during the study period, 874 (8.1%) died during admission. We find that the strongest predictors of inpatient mortality are prior admission within 3 months, malignant morbidity, serum creatinine levels, and hypoalbuminemia at hospital admission, and an admitting diagnosis of sepsis, pneumonia, malignant neoplastic disease, or cerebrovascular disease. The C-statistic of the risk prediction model is 89.4% (95% CI 88.4-90.4%). The predictive performance of this model is better than a multivariate stepwise logistic regression model. By utilizing the prediction model, the AUC for the independent (validation) data set is 85.7% (95% CI 84.1-87.3%). Using penalized regression, this prediction model identifies the most informative predictors of inpatient mortality. The model illustrates the potential value and feasibility of a tool that can aid physicians in decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansInternal MedicineIsraelLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisInpatient mortalityPenalized regressionPrediction modelROC-AUC

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.