Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29289981›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2018

Incidence, risk and prognostic role of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-induced skin rash in biliary cancer: a meta-analysis.

Fangqiang Wei, Donghun Shin, Xiujun Cai

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fangqiang WeiDepartment of General Surgery, Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No. 3, Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang, China.
Donghun ShinDepartment of Developmental Biology, Pittsburgh Liver Research Center, McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Xiujun CaiDepartment of General Surgery, Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No. 3, Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang, China. caixiujunzju@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2514-1486
University of Pittsburgh · USSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CN

Funding

the China Scholarship Council CSC No. 201606320156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-induced skin rash is a common adverse event and is considered a prognostic factor of various cancers. However, the role of rash is rarely known in biliary cancer, possibly owing to the low incidence of this frequently fatal malignancy. We thus performed a meta-analysis to investigate the incidence, risk and prognostic significance of skin rash related to anti-EGFR treatment for biliary cancer.

methodsEligible studies were enrolled after a systematic search of electronic databases. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was utilized according to the heterogeneity.

resultsFourteen clinical trials published between 2006 and 2017 comprising 1,106 patients with advanced biliary cancer were included. The overall incidence of all-grade and high-grade (grade ≥3) rash was 78.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 70.4-84.3] and 11.3% (7.6-16.5), respectively. Anti-EGFR treatment correlates with a significantly increased risk of all-grade [risk ratio (RR) 7.37, 95% CI 5.11-10.64, p < 0.0001] and high-grade (RR 6.94, 95% CI 1.89-25.45, p = 0.0035) rash compared with control medication. Higher grades of skin rash correlate with a higher objective response rate (RR 3.50, 95% CI 1.47-8.33, p = 0.0048), and a longer overall [hazard ratio (HR) 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.71, p = 0.0003) and progression-free survival (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.72, p = 0.0001) compared with lower grades or no rash in patients who received anti-EGFR treatment.

conclusionsAnti-EGFR treatment correlates with an increased risk of skin rash in advanced biliary cancer. Stratifying patients by the severity of rash may have major implications for survival benefit regarding anti-EGFR treatment for biliary cancer.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsBiliary Tract NeoplasmsCetuximabClinical Trials as TopicDisease-Free SurvivalErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideExanthemaHumansIncidencePanitumumabPrognosisRisk FactorsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochloridePanitumumabAnti-EGFRBiliary cancerMeta-analysisSkin rashSurvival

Identifiers

PMID29289981
OpenAlexW2780592694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.