Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29289942›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2017

Patterns of routine primary care for osteoarthritis in the UK: a cross-sectional electronic health records study.

Holly Jackson, Lauren A Barnett, Kelvin P Jordan, Krysia S Dziedzic, Elizabeth Cottrell, Andrew G Finney, Zoe Paskins, John J Edwards

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Holly JacksonArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele, UK.
Lauren A BarnettArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6253-9736
Kelvin P JordanArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele, UK.
Krysia S DziedzicArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele, UK.
Elizabeth CottrellArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5757-1854
Andrew G FinneyArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele, UK.
Zoe PaskinsArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele, UK.
John J EdwardsArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0432-7783
Arthritis UK · GBHaywood Community Hospital · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18139Department of Health CAT CDRF 10-018Department of Health IAT/I-PF/010/009Department of Health KMRF-2014-03-002Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine common patterns of recorded primary care for osteoarthritis (OA), and patient and provider characteristics associated with the quality of recorded care.

designAn observational study nested within a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

settingEight UK general practices who were part of the Management of Osteoarthritis in Consultations study.

participantsPatients recorded as consulting within the eight general practices for clinical OA. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Achievement of seven quality indicators of care (pain/function assessment, information provision, exercise/weight advice, analgesics, physiotherapy), recorded through an electronic template or routinely recorded in the electronic healthcare records, was identified for patients aged ≥45 years consulting over a 6-month period with clinical OA. Latent class analysis was used to cluster patients based on care received. Clusters were compared on patient and clinician-level characteristics.

results1724 patients (median by practice 183) consulted with clinical OA. Common patterns of recorded quality care were: cluster 1 (38%,

conclusionsPatterns of recorded care for OA fell into four natural clusters. Appropriate delivery of core interventions and relatively safe pharmacological options for OA are still not consistently recorded as provided in primary care. Further research to understand clinical recording behaviours and determine potential barriers to quality care alongside effective training for clinicians is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN06984617; Results.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareGeneral PracticeOsteoarthritisPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesicsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidallatent class analysisosteoarthritisprimary carequality in health care

Identifiers

PMID29289942
PMCPMC5778330
OpenAlexW2787387011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.