Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29289528›Full record

GuidelineGastroenterology2018

Cystic Fibrosis Colorectal Cancer Screening Consensus Recommendations.

Denis Hadjiliadis, Alexander Khoruts, Ann G Zauber, Sarah E Hempstead, Patrick Maisonneuve, Albert B Lowenfels, Cystic Fibrosis Colorectal Cancer Screening Task Force

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus Development Conference, NIHPractice GuidelineVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Guideline in Gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Investigating the Association Between Cystic Fibrosis and Colorectal Neoplasia: A Matched Case-Control Study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  7. Evaluation of the Need for Comprehensive Care for Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. A Qualitative Study to Improve How We Partner With Patients and Families in Healthcare Improvement Collaboratives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  17. Imaging of cystic fibrosis manifestations in the abdomen.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  18. Managing an ageing cystic fibrosis population: challenges and priorities.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  19. Collaboration between registered dietitians and gastroenterologists in cystic fibrosis care: Results of an international cross-sectional survey.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Article
  20. The ageing of people living with cystic fibrosis: what to expect now?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Denis HadjiliadisPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: denis.hadjiliadis@uphs.upenn.edu.
Alexander KhorutsDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Ann G ZauberDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Sarah E HempsteadMedical Department, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland.
Patrick MaisonneuveUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Albert B LowenfelsNew York Medical College, Valhalla, New York.
Cystic Fibrosis Colorectal Cancer Screening Task Force
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · USEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNew York Medical College · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Explanatory models of CF Survival, Infection and Intermediate Clinical OutcomesR01HL125520 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI LIOU, THEODORE GEH-LU · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsImproved therapy has substantially increased survival of persons with cystic fibrosis (CF). But the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in adults with CF is 5-10 times greater compared to the general population, and 25-30 times greater in CF patients after an organ transplantation. To address this risk, the CF Foundation convened a multi-stakeholder task force to develop CRC screening recommendations.

methodsThe 18-member task force consisted of experts including pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, a social worker, nurse coordinator, surgeon, epidemiologist, statistician, CF adult, and a parent. The committee comprised 3 workgroups: Cancer Risk, Transplant, and Procedure and Preparation. A guidelines specialist at the CF Foundation conducted an evidence synthesis February-March 2016 based on PubMed literature searches. Task force members conducted additional independent searches. A total of 1159 articles were retrieved. After initial screening, the committee read 198 articles in full and analyzed 123 articles to develop recommendation statements. An independent decision analysis evaluating the benefits of screening relative to harms and resources required was conducted by the Department of Public Health at Erasmus Medical Center, Netherlands using the Microsimulation Screening Analysis model from the Cancer Innervation and Surveillance Modeling Network. The task force included recommendation statements in the final guideline only if they reached an 80% acceptance threshold.

resultsThe task force makes 10 CRC screening recommendations that emphasize shared, individualized decision-making and familiarity with CF-specific gastrointestinal challenges. We recommend colonoscopy as the preferred screening method, initiation of screening at age 40 years, 5-year re-screening and 3-year surveillance intervals (unless shorter interval is indicated by individual findings), and a CF-specific intensive bowel preparation. Organ transplant recipients with CF should initiate CRC screening at age 30 years within 2 years of the transplantation because of the additional risk for colon cancer associated with immunosuppression.

conclusionsThese recommendations aim to help CF adults, families, primary care physicians, gastroenterologists, and CF and transplantation centers address the issue of CRC screening. They differ from guidelines developed for the general population with respect to the recommended age of screening initiation, screening method, preparation, and the interval for repeat screening and surveillance.

Indexed as

AdultAgedClinical Decision-MakingColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsConsensusCystic FibrosisDecision Support TechniquesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGastroenterologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan TransplantationPredictive Value of TestsCancerCFTRColonColonoscopyCost-Effectiveness AnalysisCystic FibrosisIntestineLarge BowelRecommendationsRectumScreening

Identifiers

PMID29289528
PMCPMC9675422
OpenAlexW2778185093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.