GuidelineGastroenterology2018
Cystic Fibrosis Colorectal Cancer Screening Consensus Recommendations.
Guideline in Gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.
- De novo colorectal cancer after kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Functional variants in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene are associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer.Human molecular genetics · 2025Pooled it
- A comprehensive systematic review of colorectal cancer screening clinical practices guidelines and consensus statements.British journal of cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review of shared decision-making in guidelines about colorectal cancer screening.European journal of cancer care · 2022Pooled it
- Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: 2020 Cystic Fibrosis Evidence Analysis Center Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2021Guideline
- Investigating the Association Between Cystic Fibrosis and Colorectal Neoplasia: A Matched Case-Control Study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Need for Comprehensive Care for Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026Article
- Intestinal adaptations increase basolateral intestinal glucose uptake and glycolysis in a mouse model of cystic fibrosis.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2026Article
- Beyond the mutations: spatiotemporal regulation of CFTR by cAMP and calcium signaling in epithelial physiology and cystic fibrosis.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025Review
- Should We Screen Sooner? Elevated CRC Incidence in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients in the United States Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Targeting Ion Channels for Cancer Therapy: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enrichment of Germline Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Pathogenic Variants in Patients With Solid Tumors: Evidence for Increased Cancer Risk.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Article
- Limited utility of faecal immunochemical testing in a colorectal cancer screening programme for adults with cystic fibrosis: insights from a prospective UK study.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Screening and monitoring across the lifespan of an ageing cystic fibrosis population.ERJ open research · 2025Review
- The Aging Patient with Cystic Fibrosis.Drugs & aging · 2025Review
- A Qualitative Study to Improve How We Partner With Patients and Families in Healthcare Improvement Collaboratives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Imaging of cystic fibrosis manifestations in the abdomen.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Managing an ageing cystic fibrosis population: challenges and priorities.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Review
- Collaboration between registered dietitians and gastroenterologists in cystic fibrosis care: Results of an international cross-sectional survey.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025Article
- The ageing of people living with cystic fibrosis: what to expect now?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Review
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byReply.2018
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsImproved therapy has substantially increased survival of persons with cystic fibrosis (CF). But the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in adults with CF is 5-10 times greater compared to the general population, and 25-30 times greater in CF patients after an organ transplantation. To address this risk, the CF Foundation convened a multi-stakeholder task force to develop CRC screening recommendations.
methodsThe 18-member task force consisted of experts including pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, a social worker, nurse coordinator, surgeon, epidemiologist, statistician, CF adult, and a parent. The committee comprised 3 workgroups: Cancer Risk, Transplant, and Procedure and Preparation. A guidelines specialist at the CF Foundation conducted an evidence synthesis February-March 2016 based on PubMed literature searches. Task force members conducted additional independent searches. A total of 1159 articles were retrieved. After initial screening, the committee read 198 articles in full and analyzed 123 articles to develop recommendation statements. An independent decision analysis evaluating the benefits of screening relative to harms and resources required was conducted by the Department of Public Health at Erasmus Medical Center, Netherlands using the Microsimulation Screening Analysis model from the Cancer Innervation and Surveillance Modeling Network. The task force included recommendation statements in the final guideline only if they reached an 80% acceptance threshold.
resultsThe task force makes 10 CRC screening recommendations that emphasize shared, individualized decision-making and familiarity with CF-specific gastrointestinal challenges. We recommend colonoscopy as the preferred screening method, initiation of screening at age 40 years, 5-year re-screening and 3-year surveillance intervals (unless shorter interval is indicated by individual findings), and a CF-specific intensive bowel preparation. Organ transplant recipients with CF should initiate CRC screening at age 30 years within 2 years of the transplantation because of the additional risk for colon cancer associated with immunosuppression.
conclusionsThese recommendations aim to help CF adults, families, primary care physicians, gastroenterologists, and CF and transplantation centers address the issue of CRC screening. They differ from guidelines developed for the general population with respect to the recommended age of screening initiation, screening method, preparation, and the interval for repeat screening and surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.