ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2017
Limitations on estimation of effective scatterer diameters.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simulation of ultrasonic scattering from scatterer size distributions using Field II.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- A Geometric Model of Ultrasound Backscatter to Describe Microstructural Anisotropy of Tissue.Ultrasonic imaging · 2023Article
- Quantitative Ultrasound: An Emerging Technology for Detecting, Diagnosing, Imaging, Evaluating, and Monitoring Disease.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Optimization of Ultrasound Backscatter Spectroscopy to Assess Neurotoxic Effects of Anesthesia in the Newborn Non-human Primate Brain.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The influence of spatial diversity in acoustic scattering properties on estimates of the effective scatterer diameter (ESD) applied to soft biological tissues is investigated. This study is based on two-dimensional simulations of scattering media, beginning with random distributions of simple disk structures where all scattering features are known exactly. It concludes with an analysis of histology maps from healthy and fatty rabbit liver. Further, the liver histology is decomposed using an orthonormal basis to separate acoustic scattering at various spatial scales and observe how it influences ESD estimates. Overall, the goal is to quantitatively interpret ESD results for diagnostic assessments despite wide variations in tissue scatterer properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.