Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29288992›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2018

The effect of increased intracranial EEG sampling rates in clinical practice.

Kathryn A Davis, Seth P Devries, Abba Krieger, Temenuzhka Mihaylova, Daniela Minecan, Brian Litt, Joost B Wagenaar, William C Stacey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathryn A DavisDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: Kathryn.Davis@uphs.upenn.edu.
Seth P DevriesDept of Pediatric Neurology, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, USA.
Abba KriegerDept of Statistics, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Temenuzhka MihaylovaDept of Neurology, University of Michigan, USA.
Daniela MinecanDept of Neurology, University of Michigan, USA.
Brian LittDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Joost B WagenaarDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, USA; Blackfynn, Inc, USA.
William C StaceyDept of Neurology, University of Michigan, USA; Dept of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, USA.

Funding

Characterizing High Frequency Oscillations as an epilepsy biomarker with Big Data toolsR01NS094399 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STACEY, WILLIAM CHARLES · 2015 to 2025
$4.1M
Localizing epileptic networks using novel 7T MRI glutamate imagingK23NS092973 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIS, KATHRYN ADAMIAK · 2016 to 2020
$980k
Modeling seizure precursors and antiepileptic brain stimulationK08NS069783 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STACEY, WILLIAM CHARLES · 2011 to 2015
$886k
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 2015096NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS069783NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS092973NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecent research suggests that high frequency intracranial EEG (iEEG) may improve localization of epileptic networks. This study aims to determine whether recording macroelectrode iEEG with higher sampling rates improves seizure localization in clinical practice.

methods14 iEEG seizures from 10 patients recorded with >2000 Hz sampling rate were downsampled to four sampling rates: 100, 200, 500, 1000 Hz. In the 56 seizures, seizure onset time and location was marked by 5 independent, blinded EEG experts.

resultsWhen reading iEEG under clinical conditions, there was no consistent difference in time or localization of seizure onset or number of electrodes involved in the seizure onset zone with sampling rates varying from 100 to 1000 Hz. Stratification of patients by outcome did not improve with higher sampling rate.

conclusionWhen utilizing standard clinical protocols, there was no benefit to acquiring iEEGs with sampling rate >100 Hz. Significant variability was noted in EEG marking both within and between individual expert EEG readers. SIGNIFICANCE: Although commercial equipment is capable of sampling much faster than 100 Hz, tools allowing visualization of subtle high frequency activity such as HFOs will be required to improve patient care. Quantitative methods may decrease reader variability, and potentially improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyEpilepsyHumansSeizuresHigh frequencyMacroelectrodeSeizure onset

Identifiers

PMID29288992
PMCPMC5955774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.