Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29288767›Full record

ArticleLife sciences2018

Surprising outcomes in cannabinoid CB1/CB2 receptor double knockout mice in two models of ischemia.

Sara Jane Ward, Francesca Castelli, Zachary W Reichenbach, Ronald F Tuma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara Jane WardLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, United States. Electronic address: saraward@temple.edu.
Francesca CastelliNovartis, Italy.
Zachary W ReichenbachLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, United States.
Ronald F TumaLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, United States.
Temple University · USNovartis (Italy) · IT

Funding

Pilot Projects Core (PPC)P30DA013429 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Munir Gunes Kutlu · 2000 to 2026
$34.6M
TRAINING PROGRAM: DRUGS OF ABUSE RELATED NEUROPEPTIDEST32DA007237 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ELLEN M UNTERWALD · 1988 to 2026
$10.6M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA013429NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe tested the hypothesis that CB1/CB2 receptor double knockout would produce significant increases in infarct size and volume and significant worsening in clinical score, using two mouse models, one of permanent ischemia and one of ischemia/reperfusion. MAIN

methodsFocal cerebral infarcts were created using either photo induced permanent injury or transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Infarct volume and motor function were evaluated in cannabinoid receptor 1/cannabinoid receptor 2 double knockout mice. KEY

findingsThe results surprisingly revealed that CB1/CB2 double knockout mice showed improved outcomes, with the most improvements in the mouse model of permanent ischemia. SIGNIFICANCE: Although the number of individuals suffering from stroke in the United States and worldwide will continue to grow, therapeutic intervention for treatment following stroke remains frustratingly limited. Both the cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) and the cannabinoid 2 receptor (CB2R) have been studied in relationship to stroke. Deletion of the CB2R has been shown to worsen outcome, while selective CB2R agonists have been demonstrated to be neuroprotective following stroke. Although initial studies of CB1R knockout mice demonstrated increased injury following stroke, indicating that activation of the CB1R was neuroprotective, later studies of selective antagonists of the CB1R also demonstrated a protective effect. Surprisingly the double knockout animals had improved outcome. Since the phenotype of the double knockout is not dramatically changed, significant changes in the contribution of other homeostatic pathways in compensation for the loss of these two important receptors may explain these apparently contradictory results.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain IschemiaCerebral InfarctionCerebrovascular CirculationInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutNeuroprotective AgentsReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2StrokeTreatment OutcomeCNR1 protein, mouseCnr2 protein, mouseNeuroprotective AgentsReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2Cannabinoid1 receptorCannabinoid 2 receptorDouble knockoutsPhoto injuryStrokeTransient middle artery occlusion

Identifiers

PMID29288767
PMCPMC5810406
OpenAlexW2777547291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.