ArticleExperimental eye research2018
Bacteria induce autophagy in a human ocular surface cell line.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The roles of autophagy and mitophagy in corneal pathology: current knowledge and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- AUTOPHAGY IN THE EYE: FROM PHYSIOLOGY TO PATHOPHYSOLOGY.Autophagy reports · 2023Article
- Autophagy in the normal and diseased cornea.Experimental eye research · 2022Review
- BNIP3L-mediated mitophagy is required for mitochondrial remodeling during the differentiation of optic nerve oligodendrocytes.Autophagy · 2021Article
- Transcription Factor EepR Is Required forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Biologically active pigment and ShlA cytolysin of Serratia marcescens induce autophagy in a human ocular surface cell line.BMC ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Rapamycin liposome gutta inhibiting fungal keratitis of rats.International journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Disparate expression of autophagy in corneas of C57BL/6 mice and BALB/c mice afterInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Cefiderocol Is an Effective Topical Monotherapy for Experimental Extensively Drug-ResistantOphthalmology scienceArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Autophagy protects cells from intracellular pathogens, but can be exploited by some infectious agents to their benefit. Currently it is not known if bacteria induce autohpagy in cells of the cornea. The goal of this study was to develop an ocular surface autophagy reporter cell line and determine whether ocular bacterial pathogens influence host responses through autophagy induction. The cell line was made using lentivirus transduction of an LC3-GFP fusion protein in human corneal limbal epithelial (HCLE) cells. LC3-GFP puncta in HCLEs were induced by rapamycin and ammonium chloride treatments, and prevented by the autophagy inhibitors 3-methyladenine (3'MA) and bafilomycin. Importantly, secretomes from Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin sensitive (MSSA) and resistant (MRSA), were found to induce autophagy, whereas other bacteria, including Acinetobacter baumannii, Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Moraxella sp., and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, did not. Our data indicates differences between tested ocular isolates of MRSA and MSSA in the activation of autophagy. HCLEs treated with 3'MA were slightly more susceptible to cytotoxic factors produced by S. marcescens and MRSA keratitis isolates, by contrast, bafilomycin A1 treatment caused no difference. This work demonstrates the successful development and validation of an autophagy reporter corneal cell line and indicates differences between ocular bacterial isolates in the activation of autophagy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.